| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 2600 vs Core i3-7100


Description
The 2600 is based on Zen+ architecture while the i3-7100 is based on Kaby Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2600 gets a score of 291.5 k points while the i3-7100 gets 124.8 k points.

Summarizing, the 2600 is 2.3 times faster than the i3-7100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
800f82
906e9
Core
Pinnacle Ridge
Kaby Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
6/12
2/4
TDP
65 W
51 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x64+6x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
3072 kB
Date
April 2018
January 2017
Mean monothread perf.
57.13k points
57.86k points
Mean multithread perf.
291.53k points
124.8k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
2600
i3-7100
Test#1 (Integers)
3.41k
4.01k (x1.18)
Test#2 (FP)
15.96k
16.38k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.69k
5.31k (x1.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.42k
3.98k (x0.23)
TOTAL
41.47k
29.69k (x0.72)

Multithread

2600

i3-7100
Test#1 (Integers)
20.88k
8.1k (x0.39)
Test#2 (FP)
110.37k
38.7k (x0.35)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
39.25k
12.69k (x0.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.66k
3.76k (x0.56)
TOTAL
177.16k
63.24k (x0.36)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2600
i3-7100
Test#1 (Integers)
13.76k
25.53k (x1.86)
Test#2 (FP)
23.03k
22.98k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.12k
5.37k (x1.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.23k
3.97k (x0.26)
TOTAL
57.13k
57.86k (x1.01)

Multithread

2600

i3-7100
Test#1 (Integers)
83.23k
54.73k (x0.66)
Test#2 (FP)
161.06k
53.55k (x0.33)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
40.52k
12.93k (x0.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.73k
3.6k (x0.53)
TOTAL
291.53k
124.8k (x0.43)

Performance/W
2600
i3-7100
Test#1 (Integers)
1281 points/W
1073 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2478 points/W
1050 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
623 points/W
254 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
103 points/W
71 points/W
TOTAL
4485 points/W
2447 points/W

Performance/GHz
2600
i3-7100
Test#1 (Integers)
3529 points/GHz
6547 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5904 points/GHz
5893 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1313 points/GHz
1377 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3904 points/GHz
1019 points/GHz
TOTAL
14650 points/GHz
14836 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4