| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 2600 vs Atom N450


Description
The 2600 is based on Zen+ architecture while the N450 is based on Bonnell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2600 gets a score of 177.2 k points while the N450 gets 3.5 k points.

Summarizing, the 2600 is 50.6 times faster than the N450 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
800f82
106ca
Core
Pinnacle Ridge
Pineview
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
1.667 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
1.667 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 559
Cores/Threads
6/12
1 /2
TDP
65 W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x64+6x32 kB
64 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
512 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
0 kB
Date
April 2018
December 2009
Mean monothread perf.
57.33k points
3.42k points
Mean multithread perf.
292.31k points
4.58k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
2600
N450
Test#1 (Integers)
3.41k
0.37k (x0.11)
Test#2 (FP)
15.96k
0.77k (x0.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.69k
0.79k (x0.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.42k
0.63k (x0.04)
TOTAL
41.47k
2.55k (x0.06)

Multithread

2600

N450
Test#1 (Integers)
20.88k
0.56k (x0.03)
Test#2 (FP)
110.37k
1.25k (x0.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
39.25k
1.09k (x0.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.66k
0.64k (x0.1)
TOTAL
177.16k
3.55k (x0.02)

Performance/W
2600
N450
Test#1 (Integers)
321 points/W
94 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1698 points/W
209 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
604 points/W
181 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
102 points/W
107 points/W
TOTAL
2726 points/W
591 points/W

Performance/GHz
2600
N450
Test#1 (Integers)
873 points/GHz
221 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4092 points/GHz
463 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1202 points/GHz
473 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4466 points/GHz
375 points/GHz
TOTAL
10633 points/GHz
1532 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4