Ryzen 5 2600 vs Atom N270
Description
The 2600 is based on Zen+ architecture while the N270 is based on Bonnell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2600 gets a score of 177.2 k points while the N270 gets 3.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 2600 is 52.1 times faster than the N270 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2600 gets a score of 177.2 k points while the N270 gets 3.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 2600 is 52.1 times faster than the N270 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
800f82
106c2
Core
Pinnacle Ridge
Diamondville
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
1.6 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 437
Cores/Threads
6/12
1 /2
TDP
65 W
3 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x64+6x32 kB
64 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
512 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
0 kB
Date
April 2018
June 2008
Mean monothread perf.
57.13k points
3.18k points
Mean multithread perf.
291.53k points
4.43k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
2600
N270
Test#1 (Integers)
3.41k
0.37k (x0.11)
Test#2 (FP)
15.96k
0.74k (x0.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.69k
0.73k (x0.16)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.42k
0.44k (x0.03)
TOTAL
41.47k
2.28k (x0.05)
Multithread
2600
N270
Test#1 (Integers)
20.88k
0.55k (x0.03)
Test#2 (FP)
110.37k
1.26k (x0.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
39.25k
1.09k (x0.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.66k
0.47k (x0.07)
TOTAL
177.16k
3.37k (x0.02)
Performance/W
2600
N270
Test#1 (Integers)
321 points/W
185 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1698 points/W
421 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
604 points/W
362 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
102 points/W
157 points/W
TOTAL
2726 points/W
1125 points/W
Performance/GHz
2600
N270
Test#1 (Integers)
873 points/GHz
229 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4092 points/GHz
463 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1202 points/GHz
457 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4466 points/GHz
277 points/GHz
TOTAL
10633 points/GHz
1425 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4