Ryzen 5 2600 vs Engineering Sample 906EC
Description
The 2600 is based on Zen+ architecture while the 906EC is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2600 gets a score of 291.5 k points while the 906EC gets 494.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 906EC is 1.7 times faster than the 2600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2600 gets a score of 291.5 k points while the 906EC gets 494.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 906EC is 1.7 times faster than the 2600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
800f82
906ec
Core
Pinnacle Ridge
Coffee Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
65 W
- W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x64+6x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
16384 kB
Date
April 2018
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
57.13k points
70.55k points
Mean multithread perf.
291.53k points
494.24k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2600
906EC
Test#1 (Integers)
13.76k
28.3k (x2.06)
Test#2 (FP)
23.03k
24.99k (x1.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.12k
5.55k (x1.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.23k
11.71k (x0.77)
TOTAL
57.13k
70.55k (x1.23)
Multithread
2600
906EC
Test#1 (Integers)
83.23k
229.27k (x2.75)
Test#2 (FP)
161.06k
209.21k (x1.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
40.52k
48.53k (x1.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.73k
7.23k (x1.07)
TOTAL
291.53k
494.24k (x1.7)
Performance/W
2600
906EC
Test#1 (Integers)
1281 points/W