| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 2600 vs Ryzen 9 3900


Description
The 2600 is based on Zen+ architecture while the 3900 is based on Zen 2.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2600 gets a score of 291.5 k points while the 3900 gets 687.5 k points.

Summarizing, the 3900 is 2.4 times faster than the 2600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
800f82
870f10
Core
Pinnacle Ridge
Matisse
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
AM4
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/12
12/24
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x64+6x32 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
12x512 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
4x16384 kB
Date
April 2018
September 2019
Mean monothread perf.
57.13k points
74.97k points
Mean multithread perf.
291.53k points
687.5k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
2600
3900
Test#1 (Integers)
3.41k
4.39k (x1.29)
Test#2 (FP)
15.96k
16.99k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.69k
7.74k (x1.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.42k
24.57k (x1.41)
TOTAL
41.47k
53.69k (x1.29)

Multithread

2600

3900
Test#1 (Integers)
20.88k
48.45k (x2.32)
Test#2 (FP)
110.37k
230.81k (x2.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
39.25k
122.82k (x3.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.66k
54.73k (x8.21)
TOTAL
177.16k
456.8k (x2.58)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2600
3900
Test#1 (Integers)
13.76k
16.85k (x1.22)
Test#2 (FP)
23.03k
26.03k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.12k
9.54k (x1.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.23k
22.55k (x1.48)
TOTAL
57.13k
74.97k (x1.31)

Multithread

2600

3900
Test#1 (Integers)
83.23k
229.41k (x2.76)
Test#2 (FP)
161.06k
292.81k (x1.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
40.52k
128.48k (x3.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.73k
36.8k (x5.47)
TOTAL
291.53k
687.5k (x2.36)

Performance/W
2600
3900
Test#1 (Integers)
1281 points/W
3529 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2478 points/W
4505 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
623 points/W
1977 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
103 points/W
566 points/W
TOTAL
4485 points/W
10577 points/W

Performance/GHz
2600
3900
Test#1 (Integers)
3529 points/GHz
3920 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5904 points/GHz
6054 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1313 points/GHz
2218 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3904 points/GHz
5243 points/GHz
TOTAL
14650 points/GHz
17435 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4