Ryzen 5 2600 vs Ryzen 7 4800H
Description
The 2600 is based on Zen+ architecture while the 4800H is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2600 gets a score of 292.3 k points while the 4800H gets 436.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 4800H is 1.5 times faster than the 2600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2600 gets a score of 292.3 k points while the 4800H gets 436.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 4800H is 1.5 times faster than the 2600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
800f82
860f01
Core
Pinnacle Ridge
Renoir
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA-FP6
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
65 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x64+6x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
2x4096 kB
Date
April 2018
January 2020
Mean monothread perf.
57.33k points
57.47k points
Mean multithread perf.
292.31k points
436.8k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2600
4800H
Test#1 (Integers)
13.83k
16.59k (x1.2)
Test#2 (FP)
23.16k
23.51k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.15k
9.38k (x1.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.18k
7.98k (x0.53)
TOTAL
57.33k
57.47k (x1)
Multithread
2600
4800H
Test#1 (Integers)
83.44k
152.43k (x1.83)
Test#2 (FP)
161.53k
195.79k (x1.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
40.62k
83.2k (x2.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.72k
5.38k (x0.8)
TOTAL
292.31k
436.8k (x1.49)
Performance/W
2600
4800H
Test#1 (Integers)
1284 points/W
3387 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2485 points/W
4351 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
625 points/W
1849 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
103 points/W
120 points/W
TOTAL
4497 points/W
9707 points/W
Performance/GHz
2600
4800H
Test#1 (Integers)
3547 points/GHz
3950 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5938 points/GHz
5599 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1321 points/GHz
2234 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3893 points/GHz
1899 points/GHz
TOTAL
14699 points/GHz
13683 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4