Ryzen 5 2600 vs Ryzen 7 1700X
Description
The 2600 is based on Zen+ architecture while the 1700X is based on Zen.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2600 gets a score of 291.5 k points while the 1700X gets 372.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 1700X is 1.3 times faster than the 2600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2600 gets a score of 291.5 k points while the 1700X gets 372.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 1700X is 1.3 times faster than the 2600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
800f82
800f11
Core
Pinnacle Ridge
Summit Ridge
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
AM4
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
65 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x64+6x32 kB
8x64+8x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
April 2018
March 2017
Mean monothread perf.
57.13k points
56.76k points
Mean multithread perf.
291.53k points
372.73k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2600
1700X
Test#1 (Integers)
13.76k
13.72k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
23.03k
22.48k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.12k
5.12k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.23k
15.44k (x1.01)
TOTAL
57.13k
56.76k (x0.99)
Multithread
2600
1700X
Test#1 (Integers)
83.23k
110.92k (x1.33)
Test#2 (FP)
161.06k
200.56k (x1.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
40.52k
54.24k (x1.34)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.73k
7.01k (x1.04)
TOTAL
291.53k
372.73k (x1.28)
Performance/W
2600
1700X
Test#1 (Integers)
1281 points/W
1168 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2478 points/W
2111 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
623 points/W
571 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
103 points/W
74 points/W
TOTAL
4485 points/W
3923 points/W
Performance/GHz
2600
1700X
Test#1 (Integers)
3529 points/GHz
3611 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5904 points/GHz
5916 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1313 points/GHz
1348 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3904 points/GHz
4063 points/GHz
TOTAL
14650 points/GHz
14938 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4