| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 2600 vs 5600G


Description
The 2600 is based on Zen+ architecture while the 5600G is based on Zen 3.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2600 gets a score of 291.5 k points while the 5600G gets 345.6 k points.

Summarizing, the 5600G is 1.2 times faster than the 2600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
800f82
a50f00
Core
Pinnacle Ridge
Cezanne
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
AM4
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/12
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x64+6x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
16384 kB
Date
April 2018
April 2021
Mean monothread perf.
57.13k points
79.76k points
Mean multithread perf.
291.53k points
345.64k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2600
5600G
Test#1 (Integers)
13.76k
22.16k (x1.61)
Test#2 (FP)
23.03k
24.46k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.12k
10.71k (x2.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.23k
22.44k (x1.47)
TOTAL
57.13k
79.76k (x1.4)

Multithread

2600

5600G
Test#1 (Integers)
83.23k
112.5k (x1.35)
Test#2 (FP)
161.06k
153.92k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
40.52k
67.75k (x1.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.73k
11.47k (x1.71)
TOTAL
291.53k
345.64k (x1.19)

Performance/W
2600
5600G
Test#1 (Integers)
1281 points/W
1731 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2478 points/W
2368 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
623 points/W
1042 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
103 points/W
177 points/W
TOTAL
4485 points/W
5318 points/W

Performance/GHz
2600
5600G
Test#1 (Integers)
3529 points/GHz
5036 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5904 points/GHz
5558 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1313 points/GHz
2434 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3904 points/GHz
5099 points/GHz
TOTAL
14650 points/GHz
18128 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4