| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 2600 vs 3600


Description
The 2600 is based on Zen+ architecture while the 3600 is based on Zen 2.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2600 gets a score of 291.5 k points while the 3600 gets 348.4 k points.

Summarizing, the 3600 is 1.2 times faster than the 2600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
800f82
870f10
Core
Pinnacle Ridge
Matisse
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
AM4
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/12
6/12
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x64+6x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
32768 kB
Date
April 2018
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
57.13k points
70.55k points
Mean multithread perf.
291.53k points
348.35k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
2600
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
3.41k
4.2k (x1.23)
Test#2 (FP)
15.96k
17.36k (x1.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.69k
7.5k (x1.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.42k
23.79k (x1.37)
TOTAL
41.47k
52.85k (x1.27)

Multithread

2600

3600
Test#1 (Integers)
20.88k
22.11k (x1.06)
Test#2 (FP)
110.37k
108.04k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
39.25k
56.81k (x1.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.66k
36.39k (x5.46)
TOTAL
177.16k
223.36k (x1.26)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2600
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
13.76k
16.04k (x1.17)
Test#2 (FP)
23.03k
24.47k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.12k
8.38k (x1.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.23k
21.66k (x1.42)
TOTAL
57.13k
70.55k (x1.23)

Multithread

2600

3600
Test#1 (Integers)
83.23k
113.63k (x1.37)
Test#2 (FP)
161.06k
143.55k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
40.52k
63.84k (x1.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.73k
27.34k (x4.06)
TOTAL
291.53k
348.35k (x1.19)

Performance/W
2600
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
1281 points/W
1748 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2478 points/W
2208 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
623 points/W
982 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
103 points/W
421 points/W
TOTAL
4485 points/W
5359 points/W

Performance/GHz
2600
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
3529 points/GHz
3819 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5904 points/GHz
5825 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1313 points/GHz
1995 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3904 points/GHz
5158 points/GHz
TOTAL
14650 points/GHz
16797 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4