| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 2600 vs 2400G


Description
The 2600 is based on Zen+ architecture while the 2400G is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2600 gets a score of 291.5 k points while the 2400G gets 198.3 k points.

Summarizing, the 2600 is 1.5 times faster than the 2400G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
800f82
810f10
Core
Pinnacle Ridge
Raven Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
AM4
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x64+6x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
4096 kB
Date
April 2018
January 2018
Mean monothread perf.
57.13k points
47.96k points
Mean multithread perf.
291.53k points
198.27k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
2600
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
3.41k
3.8k (x1.12)
Test#2 (FP)
15.96k
17.38k (x1.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.69k
5.17k (x1.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.42k
3.16k (x0.18)
TOTAL
41.47k
29.52k (x0.71)

Multithread

2600

2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
20.88k
15.28k (x0.73)
Test#2 (FP)
110.37k
76.44k (x0.69)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
39.25k
27.48k (x0.7)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.66k
3.02k (x0.45)
TOTAL
177.16k
122.2k (x0.69)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2600
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
13.76k
14.2k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
23.03k
23.23k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.12k
5.35k (x1.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.23k
5.18k (x0.34)
TOTAL
57.13k
47.96k (x0.84)

Multithread

2600

2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
83.23k
58.24k (x0.7)
Test#2 (FP)
161.06k
105.72k (x0.66)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
40.52k
28.73k (x0.71)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.73k
5.59k (x0.83)
TOTAL
291.53k
198.27k (x0.68)

Performance/W
2600
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
1281 points/W
896 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2478 points/W
1626 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
623 points/W
442 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
103 points/W
86 points/W
TOTAL
4485 points/W
3050 points/W

Performance/GHz
2600
2400G
Test#1 (Integers)
3529 points/GHz
3641 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5904 points/GHz
5957 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1313 points/GHz
1372 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3904 points/GHz
1327 points/GHz
TOTAL
14650 points/GHz
12298 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4