| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 2600 vs Ryzen 3 2200G


Description
The 2600 is based on Zen+ architecture while the 2200G is based on Zen.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2600 gets a score of 292.3 k points while the 2200G gets 157.5 k points.

Summarizing, the 2600 is 1.9 times faster than the 2200G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
800f82
810f10
Core
Pinnacle Ridge
Raven Ridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
AM4
AM4
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/4
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x64+6x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
4096 kB
Date
April 2018
February 2018
Mean monothread perf.
57.33k points
44.87k points
Mean multithread perf.
292.31k points
157.54k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2600
2200G
Test#1 (Integers)
13.83k
13.75k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
23.16k
22.58k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.15k
4.99k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.18k
3.55k (x0.23)
TOTAL
57.33k
44.87k (x0.78)

Multithread

2600

2200G
Test#1 (Integers)
83.44k
50.99k (x0.61)
Test#2 (FP)
161.53k
84.4k (x0.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
40.62k
18.95k (x0.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.72k
3.2k (x0.48)
TOTAL
292.31k
157.54k (x0.54)

Performance/W
2600
2200G
Test#1 (Integers)
1284 points/W
785 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2485 points/W
1298 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
625 points/W
292 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
103 points/W
49 points/W
TOTAL
4497 points/W
2424 points/W

Performance/GHz
2600
2200G
Test#1 (Integers)
3547 points/GHz
3716 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5938 points/GHz
6102 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1321 points/GHz
1350 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3893 points/GHz
959 points/GHz
TOTAL
14699 points/GHz
12126 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4