| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 2600 vs Core i7-12700K


Description
The 2600 is based on Zen+ architecture while the i7-12700K is based on Alder Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2600 gets a score of 292.3 k points while the i7-12700K gets 1034.1 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-12700K is 3.5 times faster than the 2600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
800f82
90672
Core
Pinnacle Ridge
Alder Lake
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
2.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
6/12
12/20
TDP
65 W
190 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x64+6x32 kB
8x32/4x64+8x48/4x32 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
8x1280+4x2048 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
25600 kB
Date
April 2018
November 2021
Mean monothread perf.
57.33k points
110.2k points
Mean multithread perf.
292.31k points
1034.06k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
2600
i7-12700K
Test#1 (Integers)
3.41k
8.44k (x2.48)
Test#2 (FP)
15.96k
21.1k (x1.32)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.69k
14.52k (x3.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.42k
12.87k (x0.74)
TOTAL
41.47k
56.92k (x1.37)

Multithread

2600

i7-12700K
Test#1 (Integers)
20.88k
70.7k (x3.39)
Test#2 (FP)
110.37k
251.29k (x2.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
39.25k
159.92k (x4.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.66k
32.47k (x4.87)
TOTAL
177.16k
514.38k (x2.9)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2600
i7-12700K
Test#1 (Integers)
13.83k
52.13k (x3.77)
Test#2 (FP)
23.16k
28.97k (x1.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.15k
15.04k (x2.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.18k
14.07k (x0.93)
TOTAL
57.33k
110.2k (x1.92)

Multithread

2600

i7-12700K
Test#1 (Integers)
83.44k
458.8k (x5.5)
Test#2 (FP)
161.53k
377.45k (x2.34)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
40.62k
171.31k (x4.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.72k
26.51k (x3.94)
TOTAL
292.31k
1034.06k (x3.54)

Performance/W
2600
i7-12700K
Test#1 (Integers)
1284 points/W
2415 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2485 points/W
1987 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
625 points/W
902 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
103 points/W
140 points/W
TOTAL
4497 points/W
5442 points/W

Performance/GHz
2600
i7-12700K
Test#1 (Integers)
3547 points/GHz
10425 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5938 points/GHz
5794 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1321 points/GHz
3008 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3893 points/GHz
2813 points/GHz
TOTAL
14699 points/GHz
22040 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4