Ryzen 5 2600 vs Core i7-1185G7
Description
The 2600 is based on Zen+ architecture while the i7-1185G7 is based on Tiger Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2600 gets a score of 291.5 k points while the i7-1185G7 gets 230.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 2600 is 1.3 times faster than the i7-1185G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2600 gets a score of 291.5 k points while the i7-1185G7 gets 230.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 2600 is 1.3 times faster than the i7-1185G7. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
800f82
806c1
Core
Pinnacle Ridge
Tiger Lake UP3
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
4.8 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1449
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
65 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x64+6x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
12288 kB
Date
April 2018
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
57.13k points
60.87k points
Mean multithread perf.
291.53k points
230.91k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2600
i7-1185G7
Test#1 (Integers)
13.76k
24.35k (x1.77)
Test#2 (FP)
23.03k
20.07k (x0.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.12k
8.61k (x1.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.23k
7.84k (x0.51)
TOTAL
57.13k
60.87k (x1.07)
Multithread
2600
i7-1185G7
Test#1 (Integers)
83.23k
93.58k (x1.12)
Test#2 (FP)
161.06k
94.71k (x0.59)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
40.52k
33.28k (x0.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.73k
9.34k (x1.39)
TOTAL
291.53k
230.91k (x0.79)
Performance/W
2600
i7-1185G7
Test#1 (Integers)
1281 points/W
3342 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2478 points/W
3383 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
623 points/W
1189 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
103 points/W
334 points/W
TOTAL
4485 points/W
8247 points/W
Performance/GHz
2600
i7-1185G7
Test#1 (Integers)
3529 points/GHz
5074 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5904 points/GHz
4182 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1313 points/GHz
1793 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3904 points/GHz
1633 points/GHz
TOTAL
14650 points/GHz
12682 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4