Ryzen 5 2600 vs Core i7-11800H
Description
The 2600 is based on Zen+ architecture while the i7-11800H is based on Tiger Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2600 gets a score of 291.5 k points while the i7-11800H gets 607.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-11800H is 2.1 times faster than the 2600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2600 gets a score of 291.5 k points while the i7-11800H gets 607.4 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-11800H is 2.1 times faster than the 2600. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
800f82
806d1
Core
Pinnacle Ridge
Tiger Lake-H
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1787
Cores/Threads
6/12
8/16
TDP
65 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x64+6x32 kB
8x32+8x48 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
8x1280 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
24576 kB
Date
April 2018
May 2021
Mean monothread perf.
57.13k points
88.34k points
Mean multithread perf.
291.53k points
607.38k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2600
i7-11800H
Test#1 (Integers)
13.76k
33.02k (x2.4)
Test#2 (FP)
23.03k
26.55k (x1.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.12k
11.72k (x2.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.23k
17.06k (x1.12)
TOTAL
57.13k
88.34k (x1.55)
Multithread
2600
i7-11800H
Test#1 (Integers)
83.23k
260.97k (x3.14)
Test#2 (FP)
161.06k
248.94k (x1.55)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
40.52k
86.55k (x2.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.73k
10.91k (x1.62)
TOTAL
291.53k
607.38k (x2.08)
Performance/W
2600
i7-11800H
Test#1 (Integers)
1281 points/W
5799 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2478 points/W
5532 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
623 points/W
1923 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
103 points/W
242 points/W
TOTAL
4485 points/W
13497 points/W
Performance/GHz
2600
i7-11800H
Test#1 (Integers)
3529 points/GHz
7177 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5904 points/GHz
5771 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1313 points/GHz
2547 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3904 points/GHz
3709 points/GHz
TOTAL
14650 points/GHz
19204 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4