Ryzen 5 2600 vs Core i5-11300H
Description
The 2600 is based on Zen+ architecture while the i5-11300H is based on Tiger Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2600 gets a score of 292.3 k points while the i5-11300H gets 285.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 2600 is 1 times faster than the i5-11300H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2600 gets a score of 292.3 k points while the i5-11300H gets 285.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 2600 is 1 times faster than the i5-11300H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
800f82
806c1
Core
Pinnacle Ridge
Tiger Lake H35
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1449
Cores/Threads
6/12
4/8
TDP
65 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x64+6x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
4x1280 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
8192 kB
Date
April 2018
January 2021
Mean monothread perf.
57.33k points
63.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
292.31k points
285.75k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2600
i5-11300H
Test#1 (Integers)
13.83k
25.83k (x1.87)
Test#2 (FP)
23.16k
23.56k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.15k
9.2k (x1.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.18k
5.06k (x0.33)
TOTAL
57.33k
63.64k (x1.11)
Multithread
2600
i5-11300H
Test#1 (Integers)
83.44k
116.87k (x1.4)
Test#2 (FP)
161.53k
121.08k (x0.75)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
40.62k
41.8k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.72k
6k (x0.89)
TOTAL
292.31k
285.75k (x0.98)
Performance/W
2600
i5-11300H
Test#1 (Integers)
1284 points/W
3339 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2485 points/W
3459 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
625 points/W
1194 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
103 points/W
171 points/W
TOTAL
4497 points/W
8164 points/W
Performance/GHz
2600
i5-11300H
Test#1 (Integers)
3547 points/GHz
5870 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5938 points/GHz
5355 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1321 points/GHz
2090 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3893 points/GHz
1149 points/GHz
TOTAL
14699 points/GHz
14465 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4