| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 2600 vs Core i3-1115G4


Description
The 2600 is based on Zen+ architecture while the i3-1115G4 is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2600 gets a score of 291.5 k points while the i3-1115G4 gets 138 k points.

Summarizing, the 2600 is 2.1 times faster than the i3-1115G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
800f82
806c1
Core
Pinnacle Ridge
Tiger Lake UP3
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.4 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA1449
Cores/Threads
6/12
2/4
TDP
65 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
6x64+6x32 kB
2x32+2x48 kB
Cache L2
6x512 kB
2x1280 kB
Cache L3
2x8192 kB
6144 kB
Date
April 2018
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
57.13k points
62.19k points
Mean multithread perf.
291.53k points
137.96k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
2600
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
3.41k
3.75k (x1.1)
Test#2 (FP)
15.96k
17.22k (x1.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.69k
9.79k (x2.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.42k
8.21k (x0.47)
TOTAL
41.47k
38.97k (x0.94)

Multithread

2600

i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
20.88k
9.19k (x0.44)
Test#2 (FP)
110.37k
35.47k (x0.32)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
39.25k
19.14k (x0.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.66k
5.82k (x0.87)
TOTAL
177.16k
69.62k (x0.39)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2600
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
13.76k
24.25k (x1.76)
Test#2 (FP)
23.03k
21.63k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.12k
9.09k (x1.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
15.23k
7.23k (x0.48)
TOTAL
57.13k
62.19k (x1.09)

Multithread

2600

i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
83.23k
56.9k (x0.68)
Test#2 (FP)
161.06k
55.68k (x0.35)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
40.52k
19.29k (x0.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.73k
6.09k (x0.91)
TOTAL
291.53k
137.96k (x0.47)

Performance/W
2600
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
1281 points/W
2032 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2478 points/W
1989 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
623 points/W
689 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
103 points/W
217 points/W
TOTAL
4485 points/W
4927 points/W

Performance/GHz
2600
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
3529 points/GHz
5914 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5904 points/GHz
5275 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1313 points/GHz
2216 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
3904 points/GHz
1764 points/GHz
TOTAL
14650 points/GHz
15169 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4