| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 2400G vs Xeon X5675


Description
The 2400G is based on Zen architecture while the X5675 is based on Westmere.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2400G gets a score of 183 k points while the X5675 gets 124.9 k points.

Summarizing, the 2400G is 1.5 times faster than the X5675 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
810f10
206c2
Core
Raven Ridge
Westmere-EP
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.067 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.467 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
4/8
6 /12
TDP
65 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
12288 kB
Date
January 2018
February 2011
Mean monothread perf.
47.96k points
21.04k points
Mean multithread perf.
198.27k points
124.92k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
2400G
X5675
Test#1 (Integers)
13.95k
8.77k (x0.63)
Test#2 (FP)
20.7k
5.82k (x0.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.33k
3.47k (x0.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.03k
2.98k (x0.99)
TOTAL
43.01k
21.04k (x0.49)

Multithread

2400G

X5675
Test#1 (Integers)
58.56k
53.23k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
92.95k
39.35k (x0.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.55k
27.05k (x0.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.98k
5.28k (x1.78)
TOTAL
183.04k
124.92k (x0.68)

Performance/W
2400G
X5675
Test#1 (Integers)
901 points/W
560 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1430 points/W
414 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
439 points/W
285 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
46 points/W
56 points/W
TOTAL
2816 points/W
1315 points/W

Performance/GHz
2400G
X5675
Test#1 (Integers)
3577 points/GHz
2529 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5308 points/GHz
1679 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1367 points/GHz
1001 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
776 points/GHz
860 points/GHz
TOTAL
11028 points/GHz
6070 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4