| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 2400G vs Xeon L5430


Description
The 2400G is based on Zen architecture while the L5430 is based on Core.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2400G gets a score of 183 k points while the L5430 gets 51.6 k points.

Summarizing, the 2400G is 3.5 times faster than the L5430. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
810f10
1067a
Core
Raven Ridge
Harpertown
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.667 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
2.667 GHz
Socket
AM4
Socket 771
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/4
TDP
65 W
50 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
2x6144 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
0 kB
Date
January 2018
September 2008
Mean monothread perf.
47.96k points
15.62k points
Mean multithread perf.
198.27k points
51.64k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
2400G
L5430
Test#1 (Integers)
13.95k
3.09k (x0.22)
Test#2 (FP)
20.7k
6.86k (x0.33)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.33k
2.66k (x0.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.03k
3.01k (x0.99)
TOTAL
43.01k
15.62k (x0.36)

Multithread

2400G

L5430
Test#1 (Integers)
58.56k
12.4k (x0.21)
Test#2 (FP)
92.95k
27.27k (x0.29)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.55k
10.41k (x0.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.98k
1.57k (x0.53)
TOTAL
183.04k
51.64k (x0.28)

Performance/W
2400G
L5430
Test#1 (Integers)
901 points/W
248 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1430 points/W
545 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
439 points/W
208 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
46 points/W
31 points/W
TOTAL
2816 points/W
1033 points/W

Performance/GHz
2400G
L5430
Test#1 (Integers)
3577 points/GHz
1160 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5308 points/GHz
2573 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1367 points/GHz
996 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
776 points/GHz
1128 points/GHz
TOTAL
11028 points/GHz
5858 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4