Ryzen 5 2400G vs Xeon E5-2697 v2
Description
The 2400G is based on Zen architecture while the E5-2697 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2400G gets a score of 188.5 k points while the E5-2697 v2 gets 633.1 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2697 v2 is 3.4 times faster than the 2400G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2400G gets a score of 188.5 k points while the E5-2697 v2 gets 633.1 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2697 v2 is 3.4 times faster than the 2400G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f10
306e4
Core
Raven Ridge
Ivy Bridge-EP
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 2011
Cores/Threads
4/8
12 /24
TDP
65 W
130 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
12x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
30720 kB
Date
January 2018
September 2013
Mean monothread perf.
47.96k points
27.92k points
Mean multithread perf.
198.27k points
633.14k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
2400G
E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
3.8k
3.44k (x0.9)
Test#2 (FP)
17.38k
9.54k (x0.55)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.17k
4.21k (x0.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.16k
3.94k (x1.25)
TOTAL
29.52k
21.13k (x0.72)
Multithread
2400G
E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
15.28k
73.17k (x4.79)
Test#2 (FP)
76.44k
230.83k (x3.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.48k
107.14k (x3.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.02k
7.99k (x2.65)
TOTAL
122.2k
419.12k (x3.43)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
2400G
E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
13.95k
10.64k (x0.76)
Test#2 (FP)
20.7k
9.53k (x0.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.33k
4.12k (x0.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.03k
3.62k (x1.19)
TOTAL
43.01k
27.91k (x0.65)
Multithread
2400G
E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
58.56k
252.69k (x4.31)
Test#2 (FP)
92.95k
238.68k (x2.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.55k
115.5k (x4.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.98k
10.98k (x3.69)
TOTAL
183.04k
617.84k (x3.38)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
2400G
E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
13.04k
10.53k (x0.81)
Test#2 (FP)
22.35k
9.98k (x0.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.37k
4k (x0.75)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.4k
3.4k (x1)
TOTAL
44.15k
27.92k (x0.63)
Multithread
2400G
E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
56.49k
247.05k (x4.37)
Test#2 (FP)
100.74k
264.43k (x2.62)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.21k
111.01k (x3.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.04k
10.66k (x3.51)
TOTAL
188.49k
633.14k (x3.36)
Performance/W
2400G
E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
869 points/W
1900 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1550 points/W
2034 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
434 points/W
854 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
47 points/W
82 points/W
TOTAL
2900 points/W
4870 points/W
Performance/GHz
2400G
E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
3343 points/GHz
3007 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5731 points/GHz
2852 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1376 points/GHz
1144 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
871 points/GHz
973 points/GHz
TOTAL
11321 points/GHz
7976 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4