Ryzen 5 2400G vs Xeon E5-2690 0
Description
The 2400G is based on Zen architecture while the E5-2690 0 is based on Sandy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2400G gets a score of 188.5 k points while the E5-2690 0 gets 185.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 2400G is 1 times faster than the E5-2690 0 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2400G gets a score of 188.5 k points while the E5-2690 0 gets 185.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 2400G is 1 times faster than the E5-2690 0 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f10
206d7
Core
Raven Ridge
Sandy Bridge-EP
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 2011
Cores/Threads
4/8
8 /16
TDP
65 W
135 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
20480 kB
Date
January 2018
March 2012
Mean monothread perf.
47.96k points
23.28k points
Mean multithread perf.
198.27k points
185.26k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
2400G
E5-2690 0
Test#1 (Integers)
13.04k
8.76k (x0.67)
Test#2 (FP)
22.35k
7.35k (x0.33)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.37k
3.86k (x0.72)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.4k
3.32k (x0.98)
TOTAL
44.15k
23.28k (x0.53)
Multithread
2400G
E5-2690 0
Test#1 (Integers)
56.49k
78.51k (x1.39)
Test#2 (FP)
100.74k
66.46k (x0.66)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.21k
36.42k (x1.29)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.04k
3.88k (x1.27)
TOTAL
188.49k
185.26k (x0.98)
Performance/W
2400G
E5-2690 0
Test#1 (Integers)
869 points/W
582 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1550 points/W
492 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
434 points/W
270 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
47 points/W
29 points/W
TOTAL
2900 points/W
1372 points/W
Performance/GHz
2400G
E5-2690 0
Test#1 (Integers)
3343 points/GHz
2305 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5731 points/GHz
1933 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1376 points/GHz
1015 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
871 points/GHz
874 points/GHz
TOTAL
11321 points/GHz
6127 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4