| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 2400G vs Xeon E5-2680 v2


Description
The 2400G is based on Zen architecture while the E5-2680 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2400G gets a score of 188.5 k points while the E5-2680 v2 gets 551.1 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2680 v2 is 2.9 times faster than the 2400G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
810f10
306e4
Core
Raven Ridge
Ivy Bridge-EP
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 2011
Cores/Threads
4/8
10 /20
TDP
65 W
115 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
10x32+10x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
10x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
25600 kB
Date
January 2018
September 2013
Mean monothread perf.
47.96k points
28.23k points
Mean multithread perf.
198.27k points
551.1k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
2400G
E5-2680 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
13.95k
11.96k (x0.86)
Test#2 (FP)
20.7k
10.73k (x0.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.33k
4.59k (x0.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.03k
4.31k (x1.42)
TOTAL
43.01k
31.6k (x0.73)

Multithread

2400G

E5-2680 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
58.56k
218.24k (x3.73)
Test#2 (FP)
92.95k
206.92k (x2.23)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.55k
100.37k (x3.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.98k
11.45k (x3.85)
TOTAL
183.04k
536.99k (x2.93)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
2400G
E5-2680 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
13.04k
10.55k (x0.81)
Test#2 (FP)
22.35k
10.02k (x0.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.37k
3.99k (x0.74)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.4k
3.66k (x1.08)
TOTAL
44.15k
28.23k (x0.64)

Multithread

2400G

E5-2680 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
56.49k
215.04k (x3.81)
Test#2 (FP)
100.74k
230.43k (x2.29)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.21k
96.87k (x3.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.04k
8.76k (x2.88)
TOTAL
188.49k
551.1k (x2.92)

Performance/W
2400G
E5-2680 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
869 points/W
1870 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1550 points/W
2004 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
434 points/W
842 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
47 points/W
76 points/W
TOTAL
2900 points/W
4792 points/W

Performance/GHz
2400G
E5-2680 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
3343 points/GHz
2931 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5731 points/GHz
2784 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1376 points/GHz
1109 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
871 points/GHz
1017 points/GHz
TOTAL
11321 points/GHz
7841 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4