| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 2400G vs Xeon E5-2670 v3


Description
The 2400G is based on Zen architecture while the E5-2670 v3 is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2400G gets a score of 198.3 k points while the E5-2670 v3 gets 452.9 k points.

Summarizing, the E5-2670 v3 is 2.3 times faster than the 2400G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
810f10
306f2
Core
Raven Ridge
Haswell-EP
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
4/8
12/24
TDP
65 W
120 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
12x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
30720 kB
Date
January 2018
September 2014
Mean monothread perf.
47.96k points
36.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
198.27k points
452.9k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
2400G
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
3.8k
3.52k (x0.93)
Test#2 (FP)
17.38k
8.68k (x0.5)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.17k
2.83k (x0.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.16k
3.13k (x0.99)
TOTAL
29.52k
18.17k (x0.62)

Multithread

2400G

E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
15.28k
32.7k (x2.14)
Test#2 (FP)
76.44k
105.18k (x1.38)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.48k
35.18k (x1.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.02k
9.54k (x3.16)
TOTAL
122.2k
182.59k (x1.49)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
2400G
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
13.95k
11.08k (x0.79)
Test#2 (FP)
20.7k
9.57k (x0.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.33k
3.18k (x0.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.03k
3.28k (x1.08)
TOTAL
43.01k
27.11k (x0.63)

Multithread

2400G

E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
58.56k
139.07k (x2.37)
Test#2 (FP)
92.95k
133.47k (x1.44)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.55k
46.6k (x1.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.98k
6.65k (x2.24)
TOTAL
183.04k
325.78k (x1.78)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
2400G
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
13.04k
11.18k (x0.86)
Test#2 (FP)
22.35k
10.06k (x0.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.37k
3.21k (x0.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.4k
3.12k (x0.92)
TOTAL
44.15k
27.57k (x0.62)

Multithread

2400G

E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
56.49k
140.98k (x2.5)
Test#2 (FP)
100.74k
145.37k (x1.44)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.21k
45.62k (x1.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.04k
6.75k (x2.22)
TOTAL
188.49k
338.73k (x1.8)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2400G
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
14.2k
18.62k (x1.31)
Test#2 (FP)
23.23k
10.49k (x0.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.35k
4.04k (x0.75)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.18k
3.26k (x0.63)
TOTAL
47.96k
36.41k (x0.76)

Multithread

2400G

E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
58.24k
236.25k (x4.06)
Test#2 (FP)
105.72k
151.05k (x1.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.73k
58.9k (x2.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.59k
6.7k (x1.2)
TOTAL
198.27k
452.9k (x2.28)

Performance/W
2400G
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
896 points/W
1969 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1626 points/W
1259 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
442 points/W
491 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
86 points/W
56 points/W
TOTAL
3050 points/W
3774 points/W

Performance/GHz
2400G
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
3641 points/GHz
6006 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5957 points/GHz
3385 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1372 points/GHz
1303 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1327 points/GHz
1052 points/GHz
TOTAL
12298 points/GHz
11745 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4