| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 2400G vs Xeon E3-1220 v3


Description
The 2400G is based on Zen architecture while the E3-1220 v3 is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2400G gets a score of 198.3 k points while the E3-1220 v3 gets 140.8 k points.

Summarizing, the 2400G is 1.4 times faster than the E3-1220 v3 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
810f10
306c3
Core
Raven Ridge
Haswell-WS
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1150
Cores/Threads
4/8
4 /4
TDP
65 W
80 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
64 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
8192 kB
Date
January 2018
June 2013
Mean monothread perf.
47.96k points
39.16k points
Mean multithread perf.
198.27k points
140.76k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
2400G
E3-1220 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
3.8k
3.45k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
17.38k
9.96k (x0.57)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.17k
4.26k (x0.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.16k
4.27k (x1.35)
TOTAL
29.52k
21.94k (x0.74)

Multithread

2400G

E3-1220 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
15.28k
14.01k (x0.92)
Test#2 (FP)
76.44k
37.68k (x0.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.48k
17.05k (x0.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.02k
7.35k (x2.44)
TOTAL
122.2k
76.09k (x0.62)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2400G
E3-1220 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
14.2k
19.17k (x1.35)
Test#2 (FP)
23.23k
10.55k (x0.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.35k
4.79k (x0.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.18k
4.65k (x0.9)
TOTAL
47.96k
39.16k (x0.82)

Multithread

2400G

E3-1220 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
58.24k
73.13k (x1.26)
Test#2 (FP)
105.72k
42.06k (x0.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.73k
18.03k (x0.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.59k
7.54k (x1.35)
TOTAL
198.27k
140.76k (x0.71)

Performance/W
2400G
E3-1220 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
896 points/W
914 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1626 points/W
526 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
442 points/W
225 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
86 points/W
94 points/W
TOTAL
3050 points/W
1759 points/W

Performance/GHz
2400G
E3-1220 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
3641 points/GHz
5478 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5957 points/GHz
3014 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1372 points/GHz
1368 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1327 points/GHz
1328 points/GHz
TOTAL
12298 points/GHz
11188 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4