Ryzen 5 2400G vs Core m3-7Y30
Description
The 2400G is based on Zen architecture while the m3-7Y30 is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2400G gets a score of 198.3 k points while the m3-7Y30 gets 52.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 2400G is 3.8 times faster than the m3-7Y30. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2400G gets a score of 198.3 k points while the m3-7Y30 gets 52.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 2400G is 3.8 times faster than the m3-7Y30. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f10
806e9
Core
Raven Ridge
Kaby Lake
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
2.6 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1515
Cores/Threads
4/8
2/4
TDP
65 W
4.5 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2018
August 2016
Mean monothread perf.
47.96k points
25.6k points
Mean multithread perf.
198.27k points
52.78k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2400G
m3-7Y30
Test#1 (Integers)
14.2k
10.02k (x0.71)
Test#2 (FP)
23.23k
9.22k (x0.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.35k
2.04k (x0.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.18k
4.31k (x0.83)
TOTAL
47.96k
25.6k (x0.53)
Multithread
2400G
m3-7Y30
Test#1 (Integers)
58.24k
21.75k (x0.37)
Test#2 (FP)
105.72k
20.51k (x0.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.73k
4.97k (x0.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.59k
5.56k (x1)
TOTAL
198.27k
52.78k (x0.27)
Performance/W
2400G
m3-7Y30
Test#1 (Integers)
896 points/W
4832 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1626 points/W
4557 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
442 points/W
1104 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
86 points/W
1236 points/W
TOTAL
3050 points/W
11730 points/W
Performance/GHz
2400G
m3-7Y30
Test#1 (Integers)
3641 points/GHz
3852 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5957 points/GHz
3547 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1372 points/GHz
786 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1327 points/GHz
1659 points/GHz
TOTAL
12298 points/GHz
9844 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4