Ryzen 5 2400G vs Core i9-10980XE
Description
The 2400G is based on Zen architecture while the i9-10980XE is based on Cascade Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2400G gets a score of 198.3 k points while the i9-10980XE gets 1241.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10980XE is 6.3 times faster than the 2400G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2400G gets a score of 198.3 k points while the i9-10980XE gets 1241.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10980XE is 6.3 times faster than the 2400G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f10
50657
Core
Raven Ridge
Cascade Lake-X
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
4.8 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 2066
Cores/Threads
4/8
18/36
TDP
65 W
165 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
18x32+18x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
18x1024 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
25344 kB
Date
January 2018
November 2019
Mean monothread perf.
47.96k points
68.33k points
Mean multithread perf.
198.27k points
1241.12k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
2400G
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
3.8k
4.52k (x1.19)
Test#2 (FP)
17.38k
17.94k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.17k
5.5k (x1.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.16k
9.64k (x3.05)
TOTAL
29.52k
37.6k (x1.27)
Multithread
2400G
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
15.28k
84.93k (x5.56)
Test#2 (FP)
76.44k
409.55k (x5.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.48k
122.88k (x4.47)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.02k
22.12k (x7.34)
TOTAL
122.2k
639.48k (x5.23)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
2400G
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
13.95k
16.03k (x1.15)
Test#2 (FP)
20.7k
23.95k (x1.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.33k
6.03k (x1.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.03k
9.37k (x3.1)
TOTAL
43.01k
55.38k (x1.29)
Multithread
2400G
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
58.56k
316.11k (x5.4)
Test#2 (FP)
92.95k
503.75k (x5.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.55k
131.82k (x4.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.98k
22.24k (x7.48)
TOTAL
183.04k
973.92k (x5.32)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
2400G
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
13.04k
16.4k (x1.26)
Test#2 (FP)
22.35k
20.97k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.37k
5.82k (x1.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.4k
8.86k (x2.61)
TOTAL
44.15k
52.05k (x1.18)
Multithread
2400G
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
56.49k
316.84k (x5.61)
Test#2 (FP)
100.74k
461.09k (x4.58)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.21k
129.82k (x4.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.04k
22.09k (x7.27)
TOTAL
188.49k
929.85k (x4.93)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2400G
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
14.2k
29.53k (x2.08)
Test#2 (FP)
23.23k
22.59k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.35k
5.99k (x1.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.18k
10.22k (x1.97)
TOTAL
47.96k
68.33k (x1.42)
Multithread
2400G
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
58.24k
587.06k (x10.08)
Test#2 (FP)
105.72k
496.41k (x4.7)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.73k
134.66k (x4.69)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.59k
22.99k (x4.11)
TOTAL
198.27k
1241.12k (x6.26)
Performance/W
2400G
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
896 points/W
3558 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1626 points/W
3009 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
442 points/W
816 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
86 points/W
139 points/W
TOTAL
3050 points/W
7522 points/W
Performance/GHz
2400G
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
3641 points/GHz
6153 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5957 points/GHz
4707 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1372 points/GHz
1248 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1327 points/GHz
2129 points/GHz
TOTAL
12298 points/GHz
14236 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4