Ryzen 5 2400G vs Core i7-950
Description
The 2400G is based on Zen architecture while the i7-950 is based on Westmere.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2400G gets a score of 183 k points while the i7-950 gets 76.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 2400G is 2.4 times faster than the i7-950 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2400G gets a score of 183 k points while the i7-950 gets 76.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 2400G is 2.4 times faster than the i7-950 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f10
106a5
Core
Raven Ridge
Bloomfield
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.066 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.333 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1366
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/4
TDP
65 W
130 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
8192 kB
Date
January 2018
June 2009
Mean monothread perf.
47.96k points
19.46k points
Mean multithread perf.
198.27k points
76.29k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
2400G
i7-950
Test#1 (Integers)
13.95k
8.01k (x0.57)
Test#2 (FP)
20.7k
5.38k (x0.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.33k
3.11k (x0.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.03k
2.96k (x0.98)
TOTAL
43.01k
19.46k (x0.45)
Multithread
2400G
i7-950
Test#1 (Integers)
58.56k
31.53k (x0.54)
Test#2 (FP)
92.95k
24.16k (x0.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.55k
15.84k (x0.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.98k
4.75k (x1.6)
TOTAL
183.04k
76.29k (x0.42)
Performance/W
2400G
i7-950
Test#1 (Integers)
901 points/W
243 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1430 points/W
186 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
439 points/W
122 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
46 points/W
37 points/W
TOTAL
2816 points/W
587 points/W
Performance/GHz
2400G
i7-950
Test#1 (Integers)
3577 points/GHz
2403 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5308 points/GHz
1614 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1367 points/GHz
934 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
776 points/GHz
888 points/GHz
TOTAL
11028 points/GHz
5839 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4