| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 2400G vs Core i7-9850H


Description
The 2400G is based on Zen architecture while the i7-9850H is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2400G gets a score of 198.3 k points while the i7-9850H gets 289.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-9850H is 1.5 times faster than the 2400G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
810f10
906ed
Core
Raven Ridge
Coffee Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
65 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
12288 kB
Date
January 2018
June 2019
Mean monothread perf.
47.96k points
49.24k points
Mean multithread perf.
198.27k points
289.3k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
2400G
i7-9850H
Test#1 (Integers)
3.8k
4.11k (x1.08)
Test#2 (FP)
17.38k
15.19k (x0.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.17k
5.04k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.16k
11.98k (x3.79)
TOTAL
29.52k
36.32k (x1.23)

Multithread

2400G

i7-9850H
Test#1 (Integers)
15.28k
22.68k (x1.48)
Test#2 (FP)
76.44k
83.77k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.48k
30.37k (x1.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.02k
8.55k (x2.84)
TOTAL
122.2k
145.37k (x1.19)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
2400G
i7-9850H
Test#1 (Integers)
13.95k
14.5k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
20.7k
20.73k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.33k
5.31k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.03k
11.09k (x3.66)
TOTAL
43.01k
51.62k (x1.2)

Multithread

2400G

i7-9850H
Test#1 (Integers)
58.56k
77.18k (x1.32)
Test#2 (FP)
92.95k
126.35k (x1.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.55k
33.63k (x1.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.98k
7.87k (x2.64)
TOTAL
183.04k
245.03k (x1.34)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2400G
i7-9850H
Test#1 (Integers)
14.2k
19.83k (x1.4)
Test#2 (FP)
23.23k
16.52k (x0.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.35k
3.87k (x0.72)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.18k
9.02k (x1.74)
TOTAL
47.96k
49.24k (x1.03)

Multithread

2400G

i7-9850H
Test#1 (Integers)
58.24k
130.19k (x2.24)
Test#2 (FP)
105.72k
121.44k (x1.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.73k
28.05k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.59k
9.62k (x1.72)
TOTAL
198.27k
289.3k (x1.46)

Performance/W
2400G
i7-9850H
Test#1 (Integers)
896 points/W
2893 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1626 points/W
2699 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
442 points/W
623 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
86 points/W
214 points/W
TOTAL
3050 points/W
6429 points/W

Performance/GHz
2400G
i7-9850H
Test#1 (Integers)
3641 points/GHz
4311 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5957 points/GHz
3591 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1372 points/GHz
841 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1327 points/GHz
1961 points/GHz
TOTAL
12298 points/GHz
10703 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4