Ryzen 5 2400G vs Core i7-9750H
Description
The 2400G is based on Zen architecture while the i7-9750H is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2400G gets a score of 198.3 k points while the i7-9750H gets 276.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-9750H is 1.4 times faster than the 2400G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2400G gets a score of 198.3 k points while the i7-9750H gets 276.5 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-9750H is 1.4 times faster than the 2400G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f10
906ed
Core
Raven Ridge
Coffee Lake-H
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
65 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
12288 kB
Date
January 2018
April 2019
Mean monothread perf.
47.96k points
62.92k points
Mean multithread perf.
198.27k points
276.46k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
2400G
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
3.8k
4.53k (x1.19)
Test#2 (FP)
17.38k
18.24k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.17k
5.76k (x1.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.16k
13.01k (x4.11)
TOTAL
29.52k
41.54k (x1.41)
Multithread
2400G
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
15.28k
24.3k (x1.59)
Test#2 (FP)
76.44k
97.88k (x1.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.48k
29.85k (x1.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.02k
11.93k (x3.96)
TOTAL
122.2k
163.95k (x1.34)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
2400G
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
13.95k
16.32k (x1.17)
Test#2 (FP)
20.7k
23.42k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.33k
6.04k (x1.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.03k
13.24k (x4.38)
TOTAL
43.01k
59.03k (x1.37)
Multithread
2400G
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
58.56k
86.92k (x1.48)
Test#2 (FP)
92.95k
126.14k (x1.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.55k
29.62k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.98k
11.86k (x3.99)
TOTAL
183.04k
254.54k (x1.39)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
2400G
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
13.04k
16.31k (x1.25)
Test#2 (FP)
22.35k
24.48k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.37k
5.87k (x1.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.4k
13.02k (x3.83)
TOTAL
44.15k
59.67k (x1.35)
Multithread
2400G
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
56.49k
87.54k (x1.55)
Test#2 (FP)
100.74k
131.05k (x1.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.21k
28.47k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.04k
11.8k (x3.88)
TOTAL
188.49k
258.87k (x1.37)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2400G
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
14.2k
25.22k (x1.78)
Test#2 (FP)
23.23k
21.97k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.35k
5.02k (x0.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.18k
10.71k (x2.07)
TOTAL
47.96k
62.92k (x1.31)
Multithread
2400G
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
58.24k
125.56k (x2.16)
Test#2 (FP)
105.72k
115.86k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.73k
25.63k (x0.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.59k
9.4k (x1.68)
TOTAL
198.27k
276.46k (x1.39)
Performance/W
2400G
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
896 points/W
2790 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1626 points/W
2575 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
442 points/W
570 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
86 points/W
209 points/W
TOTAL
3050 points/W
6144 points/W
Performance/GHz
2400G
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
3641 points/GHz
5605 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5957 points/GHz
4882 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1372 points/GHz
1115 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1327 points/GHz
2380 points/GHz
TOTAL
12298 points/GHz
13982 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4