Ryzen 5 2400G vs Core i7-8565U
Description
The 2400G is based on Zen architecture while the i7-8565U is based on Whiskey Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2400G gets a score of 198.3 k points while the i7-8565U gets 142.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 2400G is 1.4 times faster than the i7-8565U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2400G gets a score of 198.3 k points while the i7-8565U gets 142.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 2400G is 1.4 times faster than the i7-8565U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f10
806eb
Core
Raven Ridge
Whiskey Lake-U
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
1.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1528
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
8192 kB
Date
January 2018
August 2018
Mean monothread perf.
47.96k points
67.83k points
Mean multithread perf.
198.27k points
142.55k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2400G
i7-8565U
Test#1 (Integers)
14.2k
27.2k (x1.92)
Test#2 (FP)
23.23k
23.47k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.35k
4.91k (x0.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.18k
12.25k (x2.37)
TOTAL
47.96k
67.83k (x1.41)
Multithread
2400G
i7-8565U
Test#1 (Integers)
58.24k
64.33k (x1.1)
Test#2 (FP)
105.72k
58.47k (x0.55)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.73k
15.82k (x0.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.59k
3.93k (x0.7)
TOTAL
198.27k
142.55k (x0.72)
Performance/W
2400G
i7-8565U
Test#1 (Integers)
896 points/W
4288 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1626 points/W
3898 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
442 points/W
1055 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
86 points/W
262 points/W
TOTAL
3050 points/W
9503 points/W
Performance/GHz
2400G
i7-8565U
Test#1 (Integers)
3641 points/GHz
5914 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5957 points/GHz
5103 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1372 points/GHz
1067 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1327 points/GHz
2663 points/GHz
TOTAL
12298 points/GHz
14746 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4