Ryzen 5 2400G vs Core i7-5500U
Description
The 2400G is based on Zen architecture while the i7-5500U is based on Broadwell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2400G gets a score of 198.3 k points while the i7-5500U gets 82.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 2400G is 2.4 times faster than the i7-5500U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2400G gets a score of 198.3 k points while the i7-5500U gets 82.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 2400G is 2.4 times faster than the i7-5500U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f10
306d4
Core
Raven Ridge
Broadwell-U
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1168
Cores/Threads
4/8
2 /4
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2018
March 2015
Mean monothread perf.
47.96k points
40.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
198.27k points
82.89k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
2400G
i7-5500U
Test#1 (Integers)
3.8k
3.31k (x0.87)
Test#2 (FP)
17.38k
11.61k (x0.67)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.17k
3.94k (x0.76)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.16k
3.24k (x1.02)
TOTAL
29.52k
22.1k (x0.75)
Multithread
2400G
i7-5500U
Test#1 (Integers)
15.28k
5.97k (x0.39)
Test#2 (FP)
76.44k
25.54k (x0.33)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.48k
8.8k (x0.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.02k
3.36k (x1.11)
TOTAL
122.2k
43.67k (x0.36)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
2400G
i7-5500U
Test#1 (Integers)
13.95k
10.59k (x0.76)
Test#2 (FP)
20.7k
13.72k (x0.66)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.33k
4.22k (x0.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.03k
3.64k (x1.2)
TOTAL
43.01k
32.16k (x0.75)
Multithread
2400G
i7-5500U
Test#1 (Integers)
58.56k
20.8k (x0.36)
Test#2 (FP)
92.95k
30.44k (x0.33)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.55k
9.1k (x0.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.98k
3.35k (x1.13)
TOTAL
183.04k
63.69k (x0.35)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
2400G
i7-5500U
Test#1 (Integers)
13.04k
10.37k (x0.8)
Test#2 (FP)
22.35k
14.25k (x0.64)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.37k
4.07k (x0.76)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.4k
3.12k (x0.92)
TOTAL
44.15k
31.81k (x0.72)
Multithread
2400G
i7-5500U
Test#1 (Integers)
56.49k
20.93k (x0.37)
Test#2 (FP)
100.74k
33.87k (x0.34)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.21k
8.98k (x0.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.04k
3.35k (x1.1)
TOTAL
188.49k
67.13k (x0.36)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2400G
i7-5500U
Test#1 (Integers)
14.2k
17.76k (x1.25)
Test#2 (FP)
23.23k
14.9k (x0.64)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.35k
4.17k (x0.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.18k
3.58k (x0.69)
TOTAL
47.96k
40.41k (x0.84)
Multithread
2400G
i7-5500U
Test#1 (Integers)
58.24k
34.9k (x0.6)
Test#2 (FP)
105.72k
35.07k (x0.33)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.73k
9.28k (x0.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.59k
3.64k (x0.65)
TOTAL
198.27k
82.89k (x0.42)
Performance/W
2400G
i7-5500U
Test#1 (Integers)
896 points/W
2327 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1626 points/W
2338 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
442 points/W
619 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
86 points/W
243 points/W
TOTAL
3050 points/W
5526 points/W
Performance/GHz
2400G
i7-5500U
Test#1 (Integers)
3641 points/GHz
5920 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5957 points/GHz
4966 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1372 points/GHz
1390 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1327 points/GHz
1193 points/GHz
TOTAL
12298 points/GHz
13469 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4