| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 2400G vs Core i7-4702MQ


Description
The 2400G is based on Zen architecture while the i7-4702MQ is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2400G gets a score of 198.3 k points while the i7-4702MQ gets 145.1 k points.

Summarizing, the 2400G is 1.4 times faster than the i7-4702MQ . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
810f10
306c3
Core
Raven Ridge
Haswell
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.2 GHz
Socket
AM4
Socket G3
Cores/Threads
4/8
4 /8
TDP
65 W
37 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
8192 kB
Date
January 2018
May 2013
Mean monothread perf.
47.96k points
36.8k points
Mean multithread perf.
198.27k points
145.15k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
2400G
i7-4702MQ
Test#1 (Integers)
3.8k
3.45k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
17.38k
8.53k (x0.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.17k
3.99k (x0.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.16k
3.51k (x1.11)
TOTAL
29.52k
19.47k (x0.66)

Multithread

2400G

i7-4702MQ
Test#1 (Integers)
15.28k
11.93k (x0.78)
Test#2 (FP)
76.44k
42.4k (x0.55)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.48k
18k (x0.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.02k
3.6k (x1.19)
TOTAL
122.2k
75.92k (x0.62)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2400G
i7-4702MQ
Test#1 (Integers)
14.2k
18.98k (x1.34)
Test#2 (FP)
23.23k
9.5k (x0.41)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.35k
4.32k (x0.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.18k
3.99k (x0.77)
TOTAL
47.96k
36.8k (x0.77)

Multithread

2400G

i7-4702MQ
Test#1 (Integers)
58.24k
74.75k (x1.28)
Test#2 (FP)
105.72k
47.72k (x0.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.73k
19.65k (x0.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.59k
3.02k (x0.54)
TOTAL
198.27k
145.15k (x0.73)

Performance/W
2400G
i7-4702MQ
Test#1 (Integers)
896 points/W
2020 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1626 points/W
1290 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
442 points/W
531 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
86 points/W
82 points/W
TOTAL
3050 points/W
3923 points/W

Performance/GHz
2400G
i7-4702MQ
Test#1 (Integers)
3641 points/GHz
5932 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5957 points/GHz
2968 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1372 points/GHz
1351 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1327 points/GHz
1248 points/GHz
TOTAL
12298 points/GHz
11499 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4