| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 2400G vs Core i7-1065G7


Description
The 2400G is based on Zen architecture while the i7-1065G7 is based on Ice Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2400G gets a score of 198.3 k points while the i7-1065G7 gets 214.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-1065G7 is 1.1 times faster than the 2400G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
810f10
706e5
Core
Raven Ridge
Ice Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
1.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1526
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
8192 kB
Date
January 2018
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
47.96k points
74.82k points
Mean multithread perf.
198.27k points
214.34k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2400G
i7-1065G7
Test#1 (Integers)
14.2k
28.19k (x1.99)
Test#2 (FP)
23.23k
22.13k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.35k
10.32k (x1.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.18k
14.17k (x2.74)
TOTAL
47.96k
74.82k (x1.56)

Multithread

2400G

i7-1065G7
Test#1 (Integers)
58.24k
86.39k (x1.48)
Test#2 (FP)
105.72k
86.22k (x0.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.73k
32.99k (x1.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.59k
8.75k (x1.57)
TOTAL
198.27k
214.34k (x1.08)

Performance/W
2400G
i7-1065G7
Test#1 (Integers)
896 points/W
5759 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1626 points/W
5748 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
442 points/W
2199 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
86 points/W
583 points/W
TOTAL
3050 points/W
14289 points/W

Performance/GHz
2400G
i7-1065G7
Test#1 (Integers)
3641 points/GHz
7229 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5957 points/GHz
5675 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1372 points/GHz
2646 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1327 points/GHz
3634 points/GHz
TOTAL
12298 points/GHz
19184 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4