Ryzen 5 2400G vs Core i5-9500
Description
The 2400G is based on Zen architecture while the i5-9500 is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2400G gets a score of 198.3 k points while the i5-9500 gets 352.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-9500 is 1.8 times faster than the 2400G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2400G gets a score of 198.3 k points while the i5-9500 gets 352.8 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-9500 is 1.8 times faster than the 2400G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f10
906ea
Core
Raven Ridge
Coffee Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/6
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
9216 kB
Date
January 2018
April 2019
Mean monothread perf.
47.96k points
73.65k points
Mean multithread perf.
198.27k points
352.84k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
2400G
i5-9500
Test#1 (Integers)
3.8k
4.45k (x1.17)
Test#2 (FP)
17.38k
18.43k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.17k
5.84k (x1.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.16k
12.63k (x3.99)
TOTAL
29.52k
41.34k (x1.4)
Multithread
2400G
i5-9500
Test#1 (Integers)
15.28k
24.75k (x1.62)
Test#2 (FP)
76.44k
103.1k (x1.35)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.48k
32.43k (x1.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.02k
5.56k (x1.85)
TOTAL
122.2k
165.85k (x1.36)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
2400G
i5-9500
Test#1 (Integers)
13.95k
16.06k (x1.15)
Test#2 (FP)
20.7k
23.19k (x1.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.33k
6.1k (x1.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.03k
12.79k (x4.23)
TOTAL
43.01k
58.14k (x1.35)
Multithread
2400G
i5-9500
Test#1 (Integers)
58.56k
90.44k (x1.54)
Test#2 (FP)
92.95k
131.23k (x1.41)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.55k
33.85k (x1.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.98k
5.59k (x1.88)
TOTAL
183.04k
261.11k (x1.43)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
2400G
i5-9500
Test#1 (Integers)
13.04k
16.14k (x1.24)
Test#2 (FP)
22.35k
24.18k (x1.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.37k
5.87k (x1.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.4k
12.5k (x3.68)
TOTAL
44.15k
58.69k (x1.33)
Multithread
2400G
i5-9500
Test#1 (Integers)
56.49k
92.21k (x1.63)
Test#2 (FP)
100.74k
137.92k (x1.37)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.21k
33.12k (x1.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.04k
5.56k (x1.83)
TOTAL
188.49k
268.8k (x1.43)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2400G
i5-9500
Test#1 (Integers)
14.2k
29.17k (x2.05)
Test#2 (FP)
23.23k
25.49k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.35k
5.84k (x1.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.18k
13.15k (x2.54)
TOTAL
47.96k
73.65k (x1.54)
Multithread
2400G
i5-9500
Test#1 (Integers)
58.24k
166.66k (x2.86)
Test#2 (FP)
105.72k
146.9k (x1.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.73k
34.04k (x1.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.59k
5.25k (x0.94)
TOTAL
198.27k
352.84k (x1.78)
Performance/W
2400G
i5-9500
Test#1 (Integers)
896 points/W
2564 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1626 points/W
2260 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
442 points/W
524 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
86 points/W
81 points/W
TOTAL
3050 points/W
5428 points/W
Performance/GHz
2400G
i5-9500
Test#1 (Integers)
3641 points/GHz
6629 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5957 points/GHz
5793 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1372 points/GHz
1327 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1327 points/GHz
2990 points/GHz
TOTAL
12298 points/GHz
16739 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4