Ryzen 5 2400G vs Core i5-7300U
Description
The 2400G is based on Zen architecture while the i5-7300U is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2400G gets a score of 198.3 k points while the i5-7300U gets 109.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 2400G is 1.8 times faster than the i5-7300U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2400G gets a score of 198.3 k points while the i5-7300U gets 109.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 2400G is 1.8 times faster than the i5-7300U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f10
806e9
Core
Raven Ridge
Kaby Lake-U
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
4/8
2/4
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
3072 kB
Date
January 2018
January 2017
Mean monothread perf.
47.96k points
48.25k points
Mean multithread perf.
198.27k points
109.1k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
2400G
i5-7300U
Test#1 (Integers)
3.8k
3.11k (x0.82)
Test#2 (FP)
17.38k
12.24k (x0.7)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.17k
4.1k (x0.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.16k
4.96k (x1.57)
TOTAL
29.52k
24.41k (x0.83)
Multithread
2400G
i5-7300U
Test#1 (Integers)
15.28k
6.98k (x0.46)
Test#2 (FP)
76.44k
32.05k (x0.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.48k
10.82k (x0.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.02k
5.52k (x1.83)
TOTAL
122.2k
55.36k (x0.45)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
2400G
i5-7300U
Test#1 (Integers)
13.95k
9.96k (x0.71)
Test#2 (FP)
20.7k
15.11k (x0.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.33k
3.87k (x0.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.03k
4.54k (x1.5)
TOTAL
43.01k
33.47k (x0.78)
Multithread
2400G
i5-7300U
Test#1 (Integers)
58.56k
25.26k (x0.43)
Test#2 (FP)
92.95k
40.6k (x0.44)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.55k
11.24k (x0.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.98k
5.83k (x1.96)
TOTAL
183.04k
82.94k (x0.45)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
2400G
i5-7300U
Test#1 (Integers)
13.04k
9.85k (x0.76)
Test#2 (FP)
22.35k
17.37k (x0.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.37k
3.98k (x0.74)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.4k
5.11k (x1.51)
TOTAL
44.15k
36.31k (x0.82)
Multithread
2400G
i5-7300U
Test#1 (Integers)
56.49k
25.37k (x0.45)
Test#2 (FP)
100.74k
43.43k (x0.43)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.21k
10.62k (x0.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.04k
5.4k (x1.77)
TOTAL
188.49k
84.82k (x0.45)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2400G
i5-7300U
Test#1 (Integers)
14.2k
20.18k (x1.42)
Test#2 (FP)
23.23k
18.57k (x0.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.35k
4.24k (x0.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.18k
5.25k (x1.02)
TOTAL
47.96k
48.25k (x1.01)
Multithread
2400G
i5-7300U
Test#1 (Integers)
58.24k
47.75k (x0.82)
Test#2 (FP)
105.72k
44.82k (x0.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.73k
10.82k (x0.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.59k
5.7k (x1.02)
TOTAL
198.27k
109.1k (x0.55)
Performance/W
2400G
i5-7300U
Test#1 (Integers)
896 points/W
3184 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1626 points/W
2988 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
442 points/W
721 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
86 points/W
380 points/W
TOTAL
3050 points/W
7273 points/W
Performance/GHz
2400G
i5-7300U
Test#1 (Integers)
3641 points/GHz
5766 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5957 points/GHz
5306 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1372 points/GHz
1213 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1327 points/GHz
1501 points/GHz
TOTAL
12298 points/GHz
13785 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4