Ryzen 5 2400G vs Core i5-6300HQ
Description
The 2400G is based on Zen architecture while the i5-6300HQ is based on Skylake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2400G gets a score of 198.3 k points while the i5-6300HQ gets 135.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 2400G is 1.5 times faster than the i5-6300HQ. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2400G gets a score of 198.3 k points while the i5-6300HQ gets 135.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 2400G is 1.5 times faster than the i5-6300HQ. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f10
506e3
Core
Raven Ridge
Skylake-H
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.2 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA1440
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/4
TDP
65 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2018
September 2015
Mean monothread perf.
47.96k points
40.99k points
Mean multithread perf.
198.27k points
135.14k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2400G
i5-6300HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
14.2k
17.99k (x1.27)
Test#2 (FP)
23.23k
15.61k (x0.67)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.35k
3.56k (x0.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.18k
3.83k (x0.74)
TOTAL
47.96k
40.99k (x0.85)
Multithread
2400G
i5-6300HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
58.24k
64.95k (x1.12)
Test#2 (FP)
105.72k
54.01k (x0.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.73k
11.9k (x0.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.59k
4.29k (x0.77)
TOTAL
198.27k
135.14k (x0.68)
Performance/W
2400G
i5-6300HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
896 points/W
1443 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1626 points/W
1200 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
442 points/W
264 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
86 points/W
95 points/W
TOTAL
3050 points/W
3003 points/W
Performance/GHz
2400G
i5-6300HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
3641 points/GHz
5622 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5957 points/GHz
4878 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1372 points/GHz
1113 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1327 points/GHz
1196 points/GHz
TOTAL
12298 points/GHz
12808 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4