Ryzen 5 2400G vs Core i5-4590
Description
The 2400G is based on Zen architecture while the i5-4590 is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2400G gets a score of 198.3 k points while the i5-4590 gets 140 k points.
Summarizing, the 2400G is 1.4 times faster than the i5-4590 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2400G gets a score of 198.3 k points while the i5-4590 gets 140 k points.
Summarizing, the 2400G is 1.4 times faster than the i5-4590 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f10
306c3
Core
Raven Ridge
Haswell
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1150
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/4
TDP
65 W
84 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2018
June 2014
Mean monothread perf.
47.96k points
40.93k points
Mean multithread perf.
198.27k points
139.99k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2400G
i5-4590
Test#1 (Integers)
14.2k
20.88k (x1.47)
Test#2 (FP)
23.23k
11.12k (x0.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.35k
4.75k (x0.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.18k
4.19k (x0.81)
TOTAL
47.96k
40.93k (x0.85)
Multithread
2400G
i5-4590
Test#1 (Integers)
58.24k
75.76k (x1.3)
Test#2 (FP)
105.72k
40.42k (x0.38)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.73k
16.97k (x0.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.59k
6.84k (x1.22)
TOTAL
198.27k
139.99k (x0.71)
Performance/W
2400G
i5-4590
Test#1 (Integers)
896 points/W
902 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1626 points/W
481 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
442 points/W
202 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
86 points/W
81 points/W
TOTAL
3050 points/W
1667 points/W
Performance/GHz
2400G
i5-4590
Test#1 (Integers)
3641 points/GHz
5643 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5957 points/GHz
3006 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1372 points/GHz
1283 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1327 points/GHz
1132 points/GHz
TOTAL
12298 points/GHz
11063 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4