Ryzen 5 2400G vs Core i5-2430M
Description
The 2400G is based on Zen architecture while the i5-2430M is based on Sandy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2400G gets a score of 188.5 k points while the i5-2430M gets 40.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 2400G is 4.6 times faster than the i5-2430M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2400G gets a score of 188.5 k points while the i5-2430M gets 40.8 k points.
Summarizing, the 2400G is 4.6 times faster than the i5-2430M . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f10
206a7
Core
Raven Ridge
Sandy Bridge
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
AM4
Socket G2 (988B) / rPGA988B
Cores/Threads
4/8
2/4
TDP
65 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
3072 kB
Date
January 2018
October 2011
Mean monothread perf.
47.96k points
22.21k points
Mean multithread perf.
198.27k points
40.76k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
2400G
i5-2430M
Test#1 (Integers)
13.04k
8.04k (x0.62)
Test#2 (FP)
22.35k
7.37k (x0.33)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.37k
3.53k (x0.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.4k
3.27k (x0.96)
TOTAL
44.15k
22.21k (x0.5)
Multithread
2400G
i5-2430M
Test#1 (Integers)
56.49k
15.74k (x0.28)
Test#2 (FP)
100.74k
14.05k (x0.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.21k
7.16k (x0.25)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.04k
3.81k (x1.25)
TOTAL
188.49k
40.76k (x0.22)
Performance/W
2400G
i5-2430M
Test#1 (Integers)
869 points/W
450 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1550 points/W
401 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
434 points/W
205 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
47 points/W
109 points/W
TOTAL
2900 points/W
1165 points/W
Performance/GHz
2400G
i5-2430M
Test#1 (Integers)
3343 points/GHz
2680 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5731 points/GHz
2458 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1376 points/GHz
1175 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
871 points/GHz
1091 points/GHz
TOTAL
11321 points/GHz
7404 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4