Ryzen 5 2400G vs Core i3-8350K
Description
The 2400G is based on Zen architecture while the i3-8350K is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2400G gets a score of 198.3 k points while the i3-8350K gets 237.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-8350K is 1.2 times faster than the 2400G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2400G gets a score of 198.3 k points while the i3-8350K gets 237.6 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-8350K is 1.2 times faster than the 2400G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f10
906eb
Core
Raven Ridge
Coffee Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/4
TDP
65 W
91 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
8192 kB
Date
January 2018
October 2017
Mean monothread perf.
47.96k points
68.36k points
Mean multithread perf.
198.27k points
237.63k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2400G
i3-8350K
Test#1 (Integers)
14.2k
27.29k (x1.92)
Test#2 (FP)
23.23k
24.19k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.35k
5.75k (x1.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.18k
11.13k (x2.15)
TOTAL
47.96k
68.36k (x1.43)
Multithread
2400G
i3-8350K
Test#1 (Integers)
58.24k
107.78k (x1.85)
Test#2 (FP)
105.72k
95.93k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.73k
22.65k (x0.79)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.59k
11.26k (x2.02)
TOTAL
198.27k
237.63k (x1.2)
Performance/W
2400G
i3-8350K
Test#1 (Integers)
896 points/W
1184 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1626 points/W
1054 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
442 points/W
249 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
86 points/W
124 points/W
TOTAL
3050 points/W
2611 points/W
Performance/GHz
2400G
i3-8350K
Test#1 (Integers)
3641 points/GHz
6823 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5957 points/GHz
6048 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1372 points/GHz
1436 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1327 points/GHz
2784 points/GHz
TOTAL
12298 points/GHz
17091 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4