| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 2400G vs Core i3-6100T


Description
The 2400G is based on Zen architecture while the i3-6100T is based on Skylake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2400G gets a score of 198.3 k points while the i3-6100T gets 105.2 k points.

Summarizing, the 2400G is 1.9 times faster than the i3-6100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
810f10
506e3
Core
Raven Ridge
Skylake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.2 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
4/8
2/4
TDP
65 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
3072 kB
Date
January 2018
November 2015
Mean monothread perf.
47.96k points
43.92k points
Mean multithread perf.
198.27k points
105.21k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
2400G
i3-6100T
Test#1 (Integers)
3.8k
3.14k (x0.83)
Test#2 (FP)
17.38k
12.26k (x0.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.17k
3.94k (x0.76)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.16k
2.21k (x0.7)
TOTAL
29.52k
21.55k (x0.73)

Multithread

2400G

i3-6100T
Test#1 (Integers)
15.28k
6.52k (x0.43)
Test#2 (FP)
76.44k
30.61k (x0.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.48k
10.59k (x0.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.02k
2.77k (x0.92)
TOTAL
122.2k
50.49k (x0.41)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
2400G
i3-6100T
Test#1 (Integers)
13.04k
10.46k (x0.8)
Test#2 (FP)
22.35k
17.55k (x0.79)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.37k
3.71k (x0.69)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.4k
3.07k (x0.9)
TOTAL
44.15k
34.79k (x0.79)

Multithread

2400G

i3-6100T
Test#1 (Integers)
56.49k
23.92k (x0.42)
Test#2 (FP)
100.74k
42.11k (x0.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.21k
10.51k (x0.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.04k
2.57k (x0.84)
TOTAL
188.49k
79.1k (x0.42)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2400G
i3-6100T
Test#1 (Integers)
14.2k
19.58k (x1.38)
Test#2 (FP)
23.23k
16.97k (x0.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.35k
3.91k (x0.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.18k
3.47k (x0.67)
TOTAL
47.96k
43.92k (x0.92)

Multithread

2400G

i3-6100T
Test#1 (Integers)
58.24k
47.02k (x0.81)
Test#2 (FP)
105.72k
44.41k (x0.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.73k
9.93k (x0.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.59k
3.85k (x0.69)
TOTAL
198.27k
105.21k (x0.53)

Performance/W
2400G
i3-6100T
Test#1 (Integers)
896 points/W
1344 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1626 points/W
1269 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
442 points/W
284 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
86 points/W
110 points/W
TOTAL
3050 points/W
3006 points/W

Performance/GHz
2400G
i3-6100T
Test#1 (Integers)
3641 points/GHz
6119 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5957 points/GHz
5303 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1372 points/GHz
1221 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1327 points/GHz
1084 points/GHz
TOTAL
12298 points/GHz
13726 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4