Ryzen 5 2400G vs Core i3-10105
Description
The 2400G is based on Zen architecture while the i3-10105 is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2400G gets a score of 198.3 k points while the i3-10105 gets 253.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-10105 is 1.3 times faster than the 2400G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2400G gets a score of 198.3 k points while the i3-10105 gets 253.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i3-10105 is 1.3 times faster than the 2400G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f10
a0653
Core
Raven Ridge
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2018
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
47.96k points
68.92k points
Mean multithread perf.
198.27k points
253.93k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
2400G
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
3.8k
4.5k (x1.18)
Test#2 (FP)
17.38k
18.39k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.17k
5.78k (x1.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.16k
8.3k (x2.62)
TOTAL
29.52k
36.97k (x1.25)
Multithread
2400G
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
15.28k
16.13k (x1.06)
Test#2 (FP)
76.44k
75.62k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.48k
27.88k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.02k
3.57k (x1.19)
TOTAL
122.2k
123.2k (x1.01)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
2400G
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
13.95k
16.19k (x1.16)
Test#2 (FP)
20.7k
23.07k (x1.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.33k
6.04k (x1.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.03k
8.46k (x2.8)
TOTAL
43.01k
53.77k (x1.25)
Multithread
2400G
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
58.56k
57.59k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
92.95k
100.63k (x1.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.55k
28.59k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.98k
3.56k (x1.2)
TOTAL
183.04k
190.38k (x1.04)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
2400G
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
13.04k
16.11k (x1.24)
Test#2 (FP)
22.35k
24.12k (x1.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.37k
5.71k (x1.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.4k
7.89k (x2.32)
TOTAL
44.15k
53.83k (x1.22)
Multithread
2400G
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
56.49k
58.25k (x1.03)
Test#2 (FP)
100.74k
105.73k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.21k
27.8k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.04k
3.51k (x1.15)
TOTAL
188.49k
195.29k (x1.04)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2400G
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
14.2k
28.9k (x2.04)
Test#2 (FP)
23.23k
25.85k (x1.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.35k
5.88k (x1.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.18k
8.29k (x1.6)
TOTAL
47.96k
68.92k (x1.44)
Multithread
2400G
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
58.24k
111.69k (x1.92)
Test#2 (FP)
105.72k
110.23k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.73k
28.45k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.59k
3.56k (x0.64)
TOTAL
198.27k
253.93k (x1.28)
Performance/W
2400G
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
896 points/W
1718 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1626 points/W
1696 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
442 points/W
438 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
86 points/W
55 points/W
TOTAL
3050 points/W
3907 points/W
Performance/GHz
2400G
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
3641 points/GHz
6568 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5957 points/GHz
5876 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1372 points/GHz
1337 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1327 points/GHz
1883 points/GHz
TOTAL
12298 points/GHz
15664 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4