Ryzen 5 2400G vs Celeron N4120
Description
The 2400G is based on Zen architecture while the N4120 is based on Goldmont Plus.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2400G gets a score of 183 k points while the N4120 gets 46.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 2400G is 4 times faster than the N4120. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2400G gets a score of 183 k points while the N4120 gets 46.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 2400G is 4 times faster than the N4120. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f10
706a8
Core
Raven Ridge
Gemini Lake
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
1.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
2.6 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1090
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/4
TDP
65 W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
4x32+4x24 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
4096 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
0 kB
Date
January 2018
November 2019
Mean monothread perf.
47.96k points
18.9k points
Mean multithread perf.
198.27k points
46.17k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
2400G
N4120
Test#1 (Integers)
13.95k
5.94k (x0.43)
Test#2 (FP)
20.7k
7.51k (x0.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.33k
2.78k (x0.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.03k
2.67k (x0.88)
TOTAL
43.01k
18.9k (x0.44)
Multithread
2400G
N4120
Test#1 (Integers)
58.56k
15.02k (x0.26)
Test#2 (FP)
92.95k
19.77k (x0.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.55k
7.71k (x0.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.98k
3.67k (x1.23)
TOTAL
183.04k
46.17k (x0.25)
Performance/W
2400G
N4120
Test#1 (Integers)
901 points/W
2503 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1430 points/W
3294 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
439 points/W
1286 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
46 points/W
611 points/W
TOTAL
2816 points/W
7694 points/W
Performance/GHz
2400G
N4120
Test#1 (Integers)
3577 points/GHz
2286 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5308 points/GHz
2887 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1367 points/GHz
1069 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
776 points/GHz
1029 points/GHz
TOTAL
11028 points/GHz
7271 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4