Ryzen 5 2400G vs Celeron N4100
Description
The 2400G is based on Zen architecture while the N4100 is based on Goldmont Plus.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2400G gets a score of 183 k points while the N4100 gets 40.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 2400G is 4.5 times faster than the N4100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2400G gets a score of 183 k points while the N4100 gets 40.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 2400G is 4.5 times faster than the N4100. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f10
706a1
Core
Raven Ridge
Gemini Lake
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
1.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
2.4 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA1090
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/4
TDP
65 W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
4x32+4x24 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
4096 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
kB
Date
January 2018
December 2017
Mean monothread perf.
47.96k points
17.21k points
Mean multithread perf.
198.27k points
40.57k points
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
2400G
N4100
Test#1 (Integers)
13.95k
4.72k (x0.34)
Test#2 (FP)
20.7k
6.99k (x0.34)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.33k
2.69k (x0.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.03k
2.81k (x0.93)
TOTAL
43.01k
17.21k (x0.4)
Multithread
2400G
N4100
Test#1 (Integers)
58.56k
12.54k (x0.21)
Test#2 (FP)
92.95k
17.99k (x0.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.55k
6.71k (x0.23)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.98k
3.33k (x1.12)
TOTAL
183.04k
40.57k (x0.22)
Performance/W
2400G
N4100
Test#1 (Integers)
901 points/W
2090 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1430 points/W
2999 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
439 points/W
1118 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
46 points/W
555 points/W
TOTAL
2816 points/W
6762 points/W
Performance/GHz
2400G
N4100
Test#1 (Integers)
3577 points/GHz
1966 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5308 points/GHz
2914 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1367 points/GHz
1122 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
776 points/GHz
1171 points/GHz
TOTAL
11028 points/GHz
7172 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4