| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 2400G vs Celeron N3450


Description
The 2400G is based on Zen architecture while the N3450 is based on Goldmont.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2400G gets a score of 183 k points while the N3450 gets 39.3 k points.

Summarizing, the 2400G is 4.7 times faster than the N3450. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
810f10
506c9
Core
Raven Ridge
Apollo Lake
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
1.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
2.2 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA1296
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/4
TDP
65 W
6 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
4x32+4x24 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
2x1024 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
kB
Date
January 2018
August 2016
Mean monothread perf.
47.96k points
13.11k points
Mean multithread perf.
198.27k points
39.33k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
2400G
N3450
Test#1 (Integers)
3.8k
1.54k (x0.41)
Test#2 (FP)
17.38k
2.86k (x0.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.17k
1.88k (x0.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.16k
1.78k (x0.56)
TOTAL
29.52k
8.06k (x0.27)

Multithread

2400G

N3450
Test#1 (Integers)
15.28k
5.91k (x0.39)
Test#2 (FP)
76.44k
8.55k (x0.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.48k
5.48k (x0.2)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.02k
2.98k (x0.99)
TOTAL
122.2k
22.92k (x0.19)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
2400G
N3450
Test#1 (Integers)
13.95k
5.95k (x0.43)
Test#2 (FP)
20.7k
3.45k (x0.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.33k
1.92k (x0.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.03k
1.78k (x0.59)
TOTAL
43.01k
13.11k (x0.3)

Multithread

2400G

N3450
Test#1 (Integers)
58.56k
21.38k (x0.37)
Test#2 (FP)
92.95k
9.84k (x0.11)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.55k
5.25k (x0.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.98k
2.86k (x0.96)
TOTAL
183.04k
39.33k (x0.21)

Performance/W
2400G
N3450
Test#1 (Integers)
901 points/W
3564 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1430 points/W
1640 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
439 points/W
875 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
46 points/W
477 points/W
TOTAL
2816 points/W
6555 points/W

Performance/GHz
2400G
N3450
Test#1 (Integers)
3577 points/GHz
2706 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5308 points/GHz
1570 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1367 points/GHz
874 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
776 points/GHz
810 points/GHz
TOTAL
11028 points/GHz
5959 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4