Ryzen 5 2400G vs Engineering Sample 506E8 3GHz
Description
The 2400G is based on Zen architecture while the 506E8 3GHz is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2400G gets a score of 198.3 k points while the 506E8 3GHz gets 210.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 506E8 3GHz is 1.1 times faster than the 2400G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2400G gets a score of 198.3 k points while the 506E8 3GHz gets 210.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 506E8 3GHz is 1.1 times faster than the 2400G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f10
506e8
Core
Raven Ridge
Kaby Lake
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
65 W
- W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
8192 kB
Date
January 2018
June 2016
Mean monothread perf.
47.96k points
58.05k points
Mean multithread perf.
198.27k points
210.91k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2400G
506E8 3GHz
Test#1 (Integers)
14.2k
22.46k (x1.58)
Test#2 (FP)
23.23k
20.45k (x0.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.35k
4.75k (x0.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.18k
10.39k (x2.01)
TOTAL
47.96k
58.05k (x1.21)
Multithread
2400G
506E8 3GHz
Test#1 (Integers)
58.24k
92.69k (x1.59)
Test#2 (FP)
105.72k
90.45k (x0.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.73k
22.02k (x0.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.59k
5.75k (x1.03)
TOTAL
198.27k
210.91k (x1.06)
Performance/W
2400G
506E8 3GHz
Test#1 (Integers)
896 points/W