Ryzen 5 2400G vs Ryzen 9 3900X
Description
The 2400G is based on Zen architecture while the 3900X is based on Zen 2.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2400G gets a score of 198.3 k points while the 3900X gets 756.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 3900X is 3.8 times faster than the 2400G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2400G gets a score of 198.3 k points while the 3900X gets 756.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 3900X is 3.8 times faster than the 2400G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f10
870f10
Core
Raven Ridge
Matisse
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
AM4
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
12/24
TDP
65 W
105 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
12x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
4x16384 kB
Date
January 2018
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
47.96k points
72.51k points
Mean multithread perf.
198.27k points
756.3k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
2400G
3900X
Test#1 (Integers)
3.8k
4.46k (x1.17)
Test#2 (FP)
17.38k
18.46k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.17k
8.05k (x1.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.16k
23.71k (x7.49)
TOTAL
29.52k
54.68k (x1.85)
Multithread
2400G
3900X
Test#1 (Integers)
15.28k
52.65k (x3.45)
Test#2 (FP)
76.44k
265.41k (x3.47)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.48k
140.78k (x5.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.02k
46.91k (x15.56)
TOTAL
122.2k
505.76k (x4.14)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
2400G
3900X
Test#1 (Integers)
13.95k
17.35k (x1.24)
Test#2 (FP)
20.7k
25.87k (x1.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.33k
8.72k (x1.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.03k
27.86k (x9.21)
TOTAL
43.01k
79.8k (x1.86)
Multithread
2400G
3900X
Test#1 (Integers)
58.56k
201.57k (x3.44)
Test#2 (FP)
92.95k
284.41k (x3.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.55k
145.16k (x5.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
2.98k
100.56k (x33.8)
TOTAL
183.04k
731.7k (x4)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
2400G
3900X
Test#1 (Integers)
13.04k
16.95k (x1.3)
Test#2 (FP)
22.35k
25.37k (x1.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.37k
9.23k (x1.72)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.4k
24.83k (x7.31)
TOTAL
44.15k
76.38k (x1.73)
Multithread
2400G
3900X
Test#1 (Integers)
56.49k
196.31k (x3.47)
Test#2 (FP)
100.74k
290.5k (x2.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.21k
143.95k (x5.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.04k
64.92k (x21.35)
TOTAL
188.49k
695.69k (x3.69)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2400G
3900X
Test#1 (Integers)
14.2k
16.73k (x1.18)
Test#2 (FP)
23.23k
24.74k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.35k
8.82k (x1.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.18k
22.22k (x4.29)
TOTAL
47.96k
72.51k (x1.51)
Multithread
2400G
3900X
Test#1 (Integers)
58.24k
248.24k (x4.26)
Test#2 (FP)
105.72k
309.66k (x2.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.73k
140.01k (x4.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.59k
58.39k (x10.45)
TOTAL
198.27k
756.3k (x3.81)
Performance/W
2400G
3900X
Test#1 (Integers)
896 points/W
2364 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1626 points/W
2949 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
442 points/W
1333 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
86 points/W
556 points/W
TOTAL
3050 points/W
7203 points/W
Performance/GHz
2400G
3900X
Test#1 (Integers)
3641 points/GHz
3638 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5957 points/GHz
5377 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1372 points/GHz
1917 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1327 points/GHz
4831 points/GHz
TOTAL
12298 points/GHz
15763 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4