| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 2400G vs Ryzen 7 3750H


Description
The 2400G is based on Zen architecture while the 3750H is based on Zen+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2400G gets a score of 198.3 k points while the 3750H gets 175.2 k points.

Summarizing, the 2400G is 1.1 times faster than the 3750H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
810f10
810f81
Core
Raven Ridge
Picasso
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA-FP5
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
65 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
4x64+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2018
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
47.96k points
46.91k points
Mean multithread perf.
198.27k points
175.18k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
2400G
3750H
Test#1 (Integers)
3.8k
3.78k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
17.38k
16.42k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.17k
4.75k (x0.92)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.16k
5.51k (x1.74)
TOTAL
29.52k
30.46k (x1.03)

Multithread

2400G

3750H
Test#1 (Integers)
15.28k
15.18k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
76.44k
74.87k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.48k
27.85k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.02k
6.08k (x2.02)
TOTAL
122.2k
123.97k (x1.01)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2400G
3750H
Test#1 (Integers)
14.2k
13.72k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
23.23k
22.93k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.35k
4.99k (x0.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.18k
5.27k (x1.02)
TOTAL
47.96k
46.91k (x0.98)

Multithread

2400G

3750H
Test#1 (Integers)
58.24k
50.54k (x0.87)
Test#2 (FP)
105.72k
93.33k (x0.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.73k
25.25k (x0.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.59k
6.07k (x1.09)
TOTAL
198.27k
175.18k (x0.88)

Performance/W
2400G
3750H
Test#1 (Integers)
896 points/W
1444 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1626 points/W
2667 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
442 points/W
721 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
86 points/W
173 points/W
TOTAL
3050 points/W
5005 points/W

Performance/GHz
2400G
3750H
Test#1 (Integers)
3641 points/GHz
3430 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5957 points/GHz
5733 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1372 points/GHz
1248 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1327 points/GHz
1317 points/GHz
TOTAL
12298 points/GHz
11726 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4