Ryzen 5 2400G vs Ryzen 7 1700X
Description
Both models 2400G and 1700X are based on Zen architecture.
Zen is the first Ryzen generation. It uses 14nm FinFET process from GlobalFoundries. It has support for DDR4 memory and ECC. Comes with 64kB instruction + 32kB data L1 cache and 512kB L2 cache per core.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2400G gets a score of 198.3 k points while the 1700X gets 372.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 1700X is 1.9 times faster than the 2400G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Zen is the first Ryzen generation. It uses 14nm FinFET process from GlobalFoundries. It has support for DDR4 memory and ECC. Comes with 64kB instruction + 32kB data L1 cache and 512kB L2 cache per core.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2400G gets a score of 198.3 k points while the 1700X gets 372.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 1700X is 1.9 times faster than the 2400G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f10
800f11
Core
Raven Ridge
Summit Ridge
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
AM4
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
65 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
8x64+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
January 2018
March 2017
Mean monothread perf.
47.96k points
56.76k points
Mean multithread perf.
198.27k points
372.73k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
2400G
1700X
Test#1 (Integers)
13.04k
12.5k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
22.35k
22.92k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.37k
5.45k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.4k
14.72k (x4.33)
TOTAL
44.15k
55.59k (x1.26)
Multithread
2400G
1700X
Test#1 (Integers)
56.49k
92.51k (x1.64)
Test#2 (FP)
100.74k
144.76k (x1.44)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.21k
54.43k (x1.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.04k
22.08k (x7.26)
TOTAL
188.49k
313.78k (x1.66)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2400G
1700X
Test#1 (Integers)
14.2k
13.72k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
23.23k
22.48k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.35k
5.12k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.18k
15.44k (x2.98)
TOTAL
47.96k
56.76k (x1.18)
Multithread
2400G
1700X
Test#1 (Integers)
58.24k
110.92k (x1.9)
Test#2 (FP)
105.72k
200.56k (x1.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.73k
54.24k (x1.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.59k
7.01k (x1.25)
TOTAL
198.27k
372.73k (x1.88)
Performance/W
2400G
1700X
Test#1 (Integers)
896 points/W
1168 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1626 points/W
2111 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
442 points/W
571 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
86 points/W
74 points/W
TOTAL
3050 points/W
3923 points/W
Performance/GHz
2400G
1700X
Test#1 (Integers)
3641 points/GHz
3611 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5957 points/GHz
5916 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1372 points/GHz
1348 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1327 points/GHz
4063 points/GHz
TOTAL
12298 points/GHz
14938 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4