| | | | | | |

Ryzen 5 2400G vs 4500U


Description
The 2400G is based on Zen architecture while the 4500U is based on Zen 2.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2400G gets a score of 198.3 k points while the 4500U gets 194.3 k points.

Summarizing, the 2400G is 1 times faster than the 4500U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
810f10
860f01
Core
Raven Ridge
Renoir
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1140
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/6
TDP
65 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
2x4096 kB
Date
January 2018
January 2020
Mean monothread perf.
47.96k points
52.44k points
Mean multithread perf.
198.27k points
194.34k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2400G
4500U
Test#1 (Integers)
14.2k
15.37k (x1.08)
Test#2 (FP)
23.23k
23.02k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.35k
7.74k (x1.45)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.18k
6.32k (x1.22)
TOTAL
47.96k
52.44k (x1.09)

Multithread

2400G

4500U
Test#1 (Integers)
58.24k
52.52k (x0.9)
Test#2 (FP)
105.72k
99.84k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.73k
36.42k (x1.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.59k
5.56k (x0.99)
TOTAL
198.27k
194.34k (x0.98)

Performance/W
2400G
4500U
Test#1 (Integers)
896 points/W
3502 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1626 points/W
6656 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
442 points/W
2428 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
86 points/W
370 points/W
TOTAL
3050 points/W
12956 points/W

Performance/GHz
2400G
4500U
Test#1 (Integers)
3641 points/GHz
3842 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5957 points/GHz
5755 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1372 points/GHz
1935 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1327 points/GHz
1579 points/GHz
TOTAL
12298 points/GHz
13111 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4