Ryzen 5 2400G vs 3550H

Description

The 2400G is based on Zen architecture while the 3550H is based on Zen+.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2400G gets a score of 198.3 k points while the 3550H gets 178.3 k points.

Summarizing, the 2400G is 1.1 times faster than the 3550H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs

2400G

3550H

CPUID

810f10

810f81

Core

Raven Ridge

Picasso

Architecture

Zen

Zen+

Base frecuency

3.6 GHz

2.1 GHz

Boost frecuency

3.9 GHz

3.7 GHz

Socket

AM4

BGA-FP5

Cores/Threads

4/8

TDP

65 W

35 W

Cache L1 (d+i)

4x64+4x32 kB

Cache L2

4x512 kB

Cache L3

4096 kB

Date

January 2018

January 2019

Mean monothread perf.

47.96k points

45.07k points

Mean multithread perf.

198.27k points

178.26k points

Non-optimized benchmark

The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs

Monothread

2400G

3550H

Test#1 (Integers)

3.8k

3.63k (x0.96)

Test#2 (FP)

17.38k

16.69k (x0.96)

Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)

5.17k

4.92k (x0.95)

Test#1 (Memory)

3.16k

5k (x1.58)

TOTAL

29.52k

30.24k (x1.02)

Multithread

2400G

3550H

Test#1 (Integers)

15.28k

13.62k (x0.89)

Test#2 (FP)

76.44k

65.71k (x0.86)

Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)

27.48k

23.7k (x0.86)

Test#1 (Memory)

3.02k

5.64k (x1.87)

TOTAL

122.2k

108.67k (x0.89)

AVX2 optimized benchmark

The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.

Monothread

2400G

3550H

Test#1 (Integers)

14.2k

13.51k (x0.95)

Test#2 (FP)

23.23k

22.34k (x0.96)

Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)

5.35k

4.98k (x0.93)

Test#1 (Memory)

5.18k

4.24k (x0.82)

TOTAL

47.96k

45.07k (x0.94)

Multithread

2400G

3550H

Test#1 (Integers)

58.24k

52.21k (x0.9)

Test#2 (FP)

105.72k

95.66k (x0.9)

Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)

28.73k

25.54k (x0.89)

Test#1 (Memory)

5.59k

4.85k (x0.87)

TOTAL

198.27k

178.26k (x0.9)

Performance/W

2400G

3550H

Test#1 (Integers)

896 points/W

1492 points/W

Test#2 (FP)

1626 points/W

2733 points/W

Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)

442 points/W

730 points/W

Test#1 (Memory)

86 points/W

139 points/W

TOTAL

3050 points/W

5093 points/W

Performance/GHz

2400G

3550H

Test#1 (Integers)

3641 points/GHz

3652 points/GHz

Test#2 (FP)

5957 points/GHz

6038 points/GHz

Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)

1372 points/GHz

1347 points/GHz

Test#1 (Memory)

1327 points/GHz

1145 points/GHz

TOTAL

12298 points/GHz

12182 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph

Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.

Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

Multithread performance graph

Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.

Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4