Ryzen 5 2400G vs 2600
Description
The 2400G is based on Zen architecture while the 2600 is based on Zen+.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2400G gets a score of 198.3 k points while the 2600 gets 292.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 2600 is 1.5 times faster than the 2400G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2400G gets a score of 198.3 k points while the 2600 gets 292.3 k points.
Summarizing, the 2600 is 1.5 times faster than the 2400G. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f10
800f82
Core
Raven Ridge
Pinnacle Ridge
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
3.9 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
AM4
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
6x64+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
2x8192 kB
Date
January 2018
April 2018
Mean monothread perf.
47.96k points
57.33k points
Mean multithread perf.
198.27k points
292.31k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
2400G
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
3.8k
3.41k (x0.9)
Test#2 (FP)
17.38k
15.96k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.17k
4.69k (x0.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.16k
17.42k (x5.51)
TOTAL
29.52k
41.47k (x1.4)
Multithread
2400G
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
15.28k
20.88k (x1.37)
Test#2 (FP)
76.44k
110.37k (x1.44)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.48k
39.25k (x1.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
3.02k
6.66k (x2.21)
TOTAL
122.2k
177.16k (x1.45)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2400G
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
14.2k
13.83k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
23.23k
23.16k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.35k
5.15k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.18k
15.18k (x2.93)
TOTAL
47.96k
57.33k (x1.2)
Multithread
2400G
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
58.24k
83.44k (x1.43)
Test#2 (FP)
105.72k
161.53k (x1.53)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
28.73k
40.62k (x1.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.59k
6.72k (x1.2)
TOTAL
198.27k
292.31k (x1.47)
Performance/W
2400G
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
896 points/W
1284 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
1626 points/W
2485 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
442 points/W
625 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
86 points/W
103 points/W
TOTAL
3050 points/W
4497 points/W
Performance/GHz
2400G
2600
Test#1 (Integers)
3641 points/GHz
3547 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5957 points/GHz
5938 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1372 points/GHz
1321 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1327 points/GHz
3893 points/GHz
TOTAL
12298 points/GHz
14699 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4